Samsung Galaxy S25+ vs vivo X200 Ultra
79.3Performance74.3
63.6Display76.1
47.3Camera75.8
54.2Battery82.8
94.7Features86.7
6 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S25+10 spec wins — vivo X200 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
vivo X200 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 77.9 to 66.3, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+29) and camera (+29). Samsung Galaxy S25+ still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S25+
- Stronger performance score: 79 vs 74
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 87
- 18% lower weight: 190 g vs 232 g
- 16% lower thickness: 7.3 mm vs 8.7 mm
- Has eSIM — the other doesn't
Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Ultra
- Stronger display score: 76 vs 64
- Stronger camera score: 76 vs 47
- Stronger battery score: 83 vs 54
- 1900% higher telephoto: 200 MP vs 10 MP
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 ″ | 6.82 ″+2% |
| Panel type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1440x3120 | 1440x3168 |
| Pixel density | 513 ppi+1% | 510 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 4,500 nits+73% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.2 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| AnTuTu | 2,763,072Top 22% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 866,625Top 16% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 996,402Top 20% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 347,621Top 28% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 552,424Top 28% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,141+3%Top 11% | 3,062Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 10,153+8%Top 7% | 9,410Top 11% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 49 %Bottom 8% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256/512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.69 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 200 MP+1900% |
| Optical zoom | 3 x | 3.7 x+23% |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,900 mAh | 6,000 mAh+22% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W+100% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 40 W+167% |
| Active use endurance | — | 13.6 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 190 g+18% | 232 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+16% | 8.7 mm |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Armor Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (One UI 7) | Android 15 (OriginOS 5) |
| OS update pledge | 7 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |