Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Tecno Pova 8 5G
90Performance32.4
62.7Display56.5
74Camera30.1
61.2Battery81.9
94.7Features60
12 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra3 spec wins — Tecno Pova 8 5G
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 76 to 49.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+58) and camera (+44). Tecno Pova 8 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 90 vs 32
- Stronger display score: 63 vs 57
- Stronger camera score: 74 vs 30
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 60
- 308% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 11,900 vs 2,914
Reasons to pick the Tecno Pova 8 5G
- Stronger battery score: 82 vs 61
- 60% higher capacity: 8,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- 20% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | Tecno Pova 8 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+2% | 6.76 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Resolution | 3120x1440 | 1080x2344 |
| Pixel density | 498 ppi+30% | 382 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz+20% |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits+174% | 950 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 91.4 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | Tecno Pova 8 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy | MediaTek Dimensity 7100 |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 3,437,807Top 7% | 811,323 |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 1,017,509Top 7% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 1,344,505Top 7% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 390,717Top 19% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 685,076Top 8% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,850+285%Top 1% | 1,001Bottom 30% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 11,900+308%Top 1% | 2,914Bottom 36% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 99 %Top 35% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | Tecno Pova 8 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP+300% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | — |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | — |
| Optical zoom | 5 x | — |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 13 MP+8% |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | Tecno Pova 8 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 8,000 mAh+60% |
| Wired charging | 60 W+33% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 25 W | — |
| Active use endurance | — | 17 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | Tecno Pova 8 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 214 g+5% | 225 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm+10% | 8.8 mm |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP64 |
| Frame material | Titanium | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | Tecno Pova 8 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | — |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | Tecno Pova 8 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (One UI 8.5) | Android 16 (HiOS 16) |
| OS update pledge | 7 years+250% | 2 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | Tecno Pova 8 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultravs REDMI K80 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultravs Xiaomi 15 UltraVSSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultravs Honor 500 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultravs Redmi K100 ProVSTecno Pova 8 5Gvs Motorola Razr (2026)VSTecno Pova 8 5Gvs OPPO A6 Pro 5GVSTecno Pova 8 5Gvs OPPO Reno13 F 5GVSTecno Pova 8 5Gvs vivo T3 Pro 5GVS