Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 vs vivo X200 Pro mini
60.9Performance71.3
58.6Display73.8
46.9Camera65.5
47.9Battery74.7
94.7Features86.7
2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 613 spec wins — vivo X200 Pro mini
InnoReviews verdict
vivo X200 Pro mini wins this phone face-off, 72.8 to 58.4, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+27) and camera (+19). Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 87
- 20% higher Screen size: 7.6 ″ vs 6.31 ″
- Has eSIM — the other doesn't
Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Pro mini
- Stronger performance score: 71 vs 61
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 59
- Stronger camera score: 66 vs 47
- Stronger battery score: 75 vs 48
- 400% higher telephoto: 50 MP vs 10 MP
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 7.6 ″+20% | 6.31 ″ |
| Panel type | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1856x2160 | 1216x2640 |
| Pixel density | 374 ppi | 460 ppi+23% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 4,500 nits+73% |
| Screen-to-body | 90.5 % | 90.5 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 1,820,000 | 2,439,691Top 28% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 716,503Top 28% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 837,229Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 328,282Top 35% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 557,677Top 24% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,270Top 24% | 2,589+14%Top 21% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,000Top 23% | 8,078+15%Top 18% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 48 %Bottom 7% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256/512GB/1TB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP+400% |
| Optical zoom | 3 x | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP+220% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,400 mAh | 5,700 mAh+30% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 90 W+260% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 30 W+100% |
| Active use endurance | 10 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 239 g | 187 g+22% |
| Thickness | 12.1 mm | 8.2 mm+33% |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Armor Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 (One UI 6.1.1) | Android 15 (OriginOS 5) |
| OS update pledge | 7 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6vs Google Pixel 8 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6vs OPPO A7 Pro Max 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6vs REDMI Note 15 Pro+ 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6vs Huawei Pura 70VSvivo X200 Pro minivs Google Pixel 11 Pro XLVSvivo X200 Pro minivs Huawei nova 16 UltraVSvivo X200 Pro minivs iPhone 17 Pro MaxVSvivo X200 Pro minivs iQOO 15RVS