Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 vs vivo Y300 5G

WINNER
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
58.4Inno Score
VS
vivo Y300 5G
46.3Inno Score
60.9Performance28.9
58.6Display56.3
46.9Camera34.1
47.9Battery61
94.7Features73.3
5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 67 spec wins — vivo Y300 5G

InnoReviews verdict

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 wins this phone face-off, 58.4 to 46.3, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+32) and features (+21). vivo Y300 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6

  • Stronger performance score: 61 vs 29
  • Stronger camera score: 47 vs 34
  • Stronger features score: 95 vs 73
  • 50% higher RAM (max): 12 GB vs 8 GB
  • 44% higher Peak brightness: 2,600 nits vs 1,800 nits

Reasons to pick the vivo Y300 5G

  • Stronger battery score: 61 vs 48
  • 220% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 10 MP
  • 220% higher Wired charging: 80 W vs 25 W
  • 36% lower thickness: 7.8 mm vs 12.1 mm
  • 21% lower weight: 188 g vs 239 g

Display

Display comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 versus vivo Y300 5G
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6vivo Y300 5G
Screen size7.6 ″+14%6.67 ″
Panel typeFoldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2XAMOLED
Resolution1856x21601080x2400
Pixel density374 ppi394 ppi+5%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness2,600 nits+44%1,800 nits
Screen-to-body90.5 %91.9 %+2%

Performance

Performance comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 versus vivo Y300 5G
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6vivo Y300 5G
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 for GalaxyQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
AnTuTu1,820,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)2,270Top 24%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)7,000Top 23%—
RAM (max)12 GB+50%8 GB
Storage options256/512GB/1TB128/256GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 2.2

Camera

Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 versus vivo Y300 5G
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6vivo Y300 5G
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Ultra-wide12 MP—
Telephoto10 MP—
Optical zoom3 x—
Max video8K@30fps1080p
Front camera10 MP32 MP+220%
OISYes—

Battery

Battery comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 versus vivo Y300 5G
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6vivo Y300 5G
Capacity4,400 mAh5,000 mAh+14%
Wired charging25 W80 W+220%
Wireless charging15 W—
Active use endurance10 h—

Design

Design comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 versus vivo Y300 5G
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6vivo Y300 5G
Weight239 g188 g+21%
Thickness12.1 mm7.8 mm+36%
IP ratingIP48IP64
Frame materialArmor Aluminum—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 versus vivo Y300 5G
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6vivo Y300 5G
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.35.0
NFCYesNo
USBUSB-C 3.2USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 versus vivo Y300 5G
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6vivo Y300 5G
OS at launchAndroid 14 (One UI 6.1.1)Android 14 (Funtouch OS 14)
OS update pledge7 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 versus vivo Y300 5G
SpecSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6vivo Y300 5G
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNo—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup