Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs vivo X200T
75.8Performance46.7
58.4Display76.7
55.7Camera65.5
47.9Battery81.1
94.7Features84
4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 710 spec wins — vivo X200T
InnoReviews verdict
vivo X200T wins this phone face-off, 67.1 to 64.6, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+33) and display (+18). Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
- Stronger performance score: 76 vs 47
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 84
- 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP
- 40% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 5 years
- 33% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 12 GB
Reasons to pick the vivo X200T
- Stronger display score: 77 vs 58
- Stronger camera score: 66 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 81 vs 48
- 400% higher telephoto: 50 MP vs 10 MP
- 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | vivo X200T |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 8 ″+20% | 6.67 ″ |
| Panel type | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1968x2184 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 368 ppi | 460 ppi+25% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 5,000 nits+92% |
| Screen-to-body | 90.6 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | vivo X200T |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ |
| AnTuTu | 2,250,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,950Top 16% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 9,300Top 12% | — |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256/512GB/1TB | 256/512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | vivo X200T |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP+300% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP+400% |
| Optical zoom | 3 x | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP+220% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | vivo X200T |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,400 mAh | 6,200 mAh+41% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 90 W+260% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 40 W+167% |
| Active use endurance | 10 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | vivo X200T |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 215 g | 205 g+5% |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8 mm+10% |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Armor Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | vivo X200T |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | vivo X200T |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (One UI 8) | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | 7 years+40% | 5 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | vivo X200T |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7vs Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate DesignVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7vs HONOR X9dVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7vs iPhone DuoVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7vs OPPO Reno14 Pro 5GVSvivo X200Tvs Google Pixel 10 Pro XLVSvivo X200Tvs vivo X Fold3 ProVSvivo X200Tvs Xiaomi 14VSvivo X200Tvs vivo X Fold5VS