Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs Vivo X300
75.8Performance85.4
58.4Display73.5
55.7Camera78.1
47.9Battery87.2
94.7Features84
3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 714 spec wins — Vivo X300
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 wins this phone face-off, 81.8 to 64.6, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+39) and camera (+22). Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 84
- 40% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 5 years
- 27% higher Screen size: 8 ″ vs 6.31 ″
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300
- Stronger performance score: 85 vs 76
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 58
- Stronger camera score: 78 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 87 vs 48
- 400% higher telephoto: 50 MP vs 10 MP
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 8 ″+27% | 6.31 ″ |
| Panel type | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1968x2184 | 1216x2640 |
| Pixel density | 368 ppi | 461 ppi+25% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 4,500 nits+73% |
| Screen-to-body | 90.6 %+1% | 90.1 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| AnTuTu | 2,250,000 | 3,416,530+52% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,950Top 16% | 3,446+17%Top 7% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 9,300Top 12% | 9,843+6%Top 8% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 256/512GB/1TB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.68 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP+400% |
| Optical zoom | 3 x | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 4K@120fps |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP+400% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,400 mAh | 6,040 mAh+37% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 90 W+260% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 40 W+167% |
| Active use endurance | 10 h | 17.5 h+75% |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 215 g | 190 g+12% |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8 mm+11% |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Armor Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (One UI 8) | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | 7 years+40% | 5 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7vs Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate DesignVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7vs HONOR X9dVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7vs iPhone DuoVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7vs OPPO Reno14 Pro 5GVSVivo X300vs OPPO Find X9 ProVSVivo X300vs OnePlus 15VSVivo X300vs Xiaomi 17T ProVSVivo X300vs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVS