Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
75.8Performance93.3
58.4Display82.3
55.7Camera84.6
47.9Battery91.5
94.7Features84
4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 715 spec wins — Vivo X300 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 88.1 to 64.6, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+44) and camera (+29). Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 84
- 40% higher OS update pledge: 7 years vs 5 years
- 17% higher Screen size: 8 ″ vs 6.82 ″
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 93 vs 76
- Stronger display score: 82 vs 58
- Stronger camera score: 85 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 92 vs 48
- 1900% higher telephoto: 200 MP vs 10 MP
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 8 ″+17% | 6.82 ″ |
| Panel type | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1968x2184 | 1440x3168 |
| Pixel density | 368 ppi | 510 ppi+39% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz+20% |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 4,500 nits+73% |
| Screen-to-body | 90.6 % | 90.3 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| AnTuTu | 2,250,000 | 4,085,695+82% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,950Top 16% | 3,730+26%Top 3% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 9,300Top 12% | 11,494+24%Top 3% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 256/512GB/1TB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 200 MP+1900% |
| Optical zoom | 3 x | 3.7 x+23% |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP+400% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,400 mAh | 6,600 mAh+50% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 100 W+300% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 40 W+167% |
| Active use endurance | 10 h | 16 h+60% |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 215 g+7% | 232 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.2 mm+8% |
| IP rating | IP48 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Armor Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (One UI 8) | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | 7 years+40% | 5 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7vs Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate DesignVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7vs HONOR X9dVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7vs iPhone DuoVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 7vs OPPO Reno14 Pro 5GVSVivo X300 Ultravs iQOO 15 UltraVSVivo X300 Ultravs OPPO Find X9 UltraVSVivo X300 Ultravs Honor Magic8 ProVSVivo X300 Ultravs realme GT 8 ProVS