Skip to content
InnoReviews

Sharp AQUOS R11 vs vivo X Fold3 Pro

Sharp AQUOS R11
60.2Inno Score
VS
WINNER
vivo X Fold3 Pro
67Inno Score
46.7Performance54.5
76.2Display71.4
68.3Camera66.4
50.1Battery82.5
73.3Features65.3
7 spec wins — Sharp AQUOS R119 spec wins — vivo X Fold3 Pro

InnoReviews verdict

vivo X Fold3 Pro wins this phone face-off, 67 to 60.2, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+32) and performance (+8). Sharp AQUOS R11 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Sharp AQUOS R11

  • Stronger display score: 76 vs 71
  • Stronger features score: 73 vs 65
  • 100% higher Refresh rate: 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 57% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 32 MP
  • 21% lower thickness: 8.9 mm vs 11.2 mm

Reasons to pick the vivo X Fold3 Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 55 vs 47
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 50
  • 178% higher Wired charging: 100 W vs 36 W
  • 66% higher telephoto: 64 MP vs 39 MP
  • 33% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 12 GB

Display

Display comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus vivo X Fold3 Pro
SpecSharp AQUOS R11vivo X Fold3 Pro
Screen size6.5 ″8.03 ″+24%
Panel typeLTPO Pro IGZO OLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
Resolution1080x23402200x2480
Pixel density396 ppi412 ppi+4%
Refresh rate240 Hz+100%120 Hz
Peak brightness3,600 nits4,500 nits+25%
Screen-to-body89.8 %90.6 %+1%

Performance

Performance comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus vivo X Fold3 Pro
SpecSharp AQUOS R11vivo X Fold3 Pro
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,193Top 28%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—6,791Top 25%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options256/512GB512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.0

Camera

Camera comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus vivo X Fold3 Pro
SpecSharp AQUOS R11vivo X Fold3 Pro
Main camera50 MP+1%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.9f/1.68
Ultra-wide50 MP+1%50 MP
Telephoto39 MP64 MP+66%
Optical zoom2.9 x3 x+3%
Max video4K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera50 MP+57%32 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus vivo X Fold3 Pro
SpecSharp AQUOS R11vivo X Fold3 Pro
Capacity5,100 mAh5,700 mAh+12%
Wired charging36 W100 W+178%
Wireless charging—50 W
Active use endurance—13.4 h

Design

Design comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus vivo X Fold3 Pro
SpecSharp AQUOS R11vivo X Fold3 Pro
Weight195 g+17%236 g
Thickness8.9 mm+21%11.2 mm
IP ratingIP68/IP69IPX8
Frame materialAluminumAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus vivo X Fold3 Pro
SpecSharp AQUOS R11vivo X Fold3 Pro
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth6.05.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 3.2USB-C 3.2
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus vivo X Fold3 Pro
SpecSharp AQUOS R11vivo X Fold3 Pro
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 14 (Funtouch OS 14)
OS update pledge3 years3 years

Audio

Audio comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus vivo X Fold3 Pro
SpecSharp AQUOS R11vivo X Fold3 Pro
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup