Skip to content
InnoReviews

Sharp AQUOS R11 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

Sharp AQUOS R11
60.2Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300 Ultra
88.1Inno Score
46.7Performance93.3
76.2Display82.3
68.3Camera84.6
50.1Battery91.5
73.3Features84
4 spec wins — Sharp AQUOS R1112 spec wins — Vivo X300 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 88.1 to 60.2, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+47) and battery (+41). Sharp AQUOS R11 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Sharp AQUOS R11

  • 67% higher Refresh rate: 240 Hz vs 144 Hz
  • 16% lower weight: 195 g vs 232 g

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 93 vs 47
  • Stronger display score: 82 vs 76
  • Stronger camera score: 85 vs 68
  • Stronger battery score: 92 vs 50
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 73

Display

Display comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Vivo X300 Ultra
Screen size6.5 ″6.82 ″+5%
Panel typeLTPO Pro IGZO OLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1080x23401440x3168
Pixel density396 ppi510 ppi+29%
Refresh rate240 Hz+67%144 Hz
Peak brightness3,600 nits4,500 nits+25%
Screen-to-body89.8 %90.3 %+1%

Performance

Performance comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Vivo X300 Ultra
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu—4,085,695
Geekbench 6 (single)—3,730Top 3%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—11,494Top 3%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options256/512GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Vivo X300 Ultra
Main camera50 MP200 MP+298%
Main aperturef/1.9f/1.9
Ultra-wide50 MP+1%50 MP
Telephoto39 MP200 MP+419%
Optical zoom2.9 x3.7 x+28%
Max video4K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera50 MP+1%50 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Vivo X300 Ultra
Capacity5,100 mAh6,600 mAh+29%
Wired charging36 W100 W+178%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—16 h

Design

Design comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Vivo X300 Ultra
Weight195 g+16%232 g
Thickness8.9 mm8.2 mm+8%
IP ratingIP68/IP69IP68/IP69
Frame materialAluminumAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Vivo X300 Ultra
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth6.05.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 3.2USB-C 3.2
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Vivo X300 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge3 years5 years+67%

Audio

Audio comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Vivo X300 Ultra
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup