Skip to content
InnoReviews

Sharp AQUOS R11 vs Xiaomi 14 Ultra

Sharp AQUOS R11
60.2Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Xiaomi 14 Ultra

Xiaomi

Xiaomi 14 Ultra

$1,499

68.2Inno Score
46.7Performance63.4
76.2Display67.5
68.3Camera69.5
50.1Battery73.6
73.3Features70.7
10 spec wins — Sharp AQUOS R117 spec wins — Xiaomi 14 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

Xiaomi 14 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 68.2 to 60.2, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+23) and performance (+17). Sharp AQUOS R11 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Sharp AQUOS R11

  • Stronger display score: 76 vs 68
  • 100% higher Refresh rate: 240 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 57% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 32 MP
  • 20% higher Peak brightness: 3,600 nits vs 3,000 nits
  • 11% lower weight: 195 g vs 220 g

Reasons to pick the Xiaomi 14 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 63 vs 47
  • Stronger battery score: 74 vs 50
  • 150% higher Wired charging: 90 W vs 36 W
  • 72% higher Optical zoom: 5 x vs 2.9 x
  • 33% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 12 GB

Display

Display comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Xiaomi 14 Ultra
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Screen size6.5 ″6.73 ″+4%
Panel typeLTPO Pro IGZO OLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1080x23401440x3200
Pixel density396 ppi522 ppi+32%
Refresh rate240 Hz+100%120 Hz
Peak brightness3,600 nits+20%3,000 nits
Screen-to-body89.8 %89.5 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Xiaomi 14 Ultra
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Xiaomi 14 Ultra
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
AnTuTu—1,900,000
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,240Top 27%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—7,000Top 23%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options256/512GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.0

Camera

Camera comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Xiaomi 14 Ultra
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Main camera50 MP+1%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.9f/1.63-4.0
Ultra-wide50 MP+1%50 MP
Telephoto39 MP50 MP+30%
Optical zoom2.9 x5 x+72%
Max video4K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera50 MP+57%32 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Xiaomi 14 Ultra
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Capacity5,100 mAh+2%5,000 mAh
Wired charging36 W90 W+150%
Wireless charging—80 W
Active use endurance—11 h

Design

Design comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Xiaomi 14 Ultra
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Weight195 g+11%220 g
Thickness8.9 mm+3%9.2 mm
IP ratingIP68/IP69IP68
Frame materialAluminumAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Xiaomi 14 Ultra
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Xiaomi 14 Ultra
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth6.05.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 3.2USB-C 3.2
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Xiaomi 14 Ultra
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Xiaomi 14 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 14 (HyperOS)
OS update pledge3 years4 years+33%

Audio

Audio comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Xiaomi 14 Ultra
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Xiaomi 14 Ultra
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Sharp AQUOS R11vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FEVSSharp AQUOS R11vs HONOR 200 ProVSSharp AQUOS R11vs Huawei Enjoy 90 Pro MaxVSSharp AQUOS R11vs Huawei Pura 80VSXiaomi 14 Ultravs POCO X8 ProVSXiaomi 14 Ultravs realme Neo7VSXiaomi 14 Ultravs OPPO Find X7 UltraVSXiaomi 14 Ultravs 8849 Tank 5 ProVS

Try another matchup