Skip to content
InnoReviews

Sharp AQUOS R11 vs Xiaomi 17T Pro

Sharp AQUOS R11
60.2Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Xiaomi 17T Pro
81.5Inno Score
46.7Performance84.8
76.2Display74.1
68.3Camera61.4
50.1Battery95
73.3Features100
6 spec wins — Sharp AQUOS R119 spec wins — Xiaomi 17T Pro

InnoReviews verdict

Xiaomi 17T Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.5 to 60.2, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+45) and performance (+38). Sharp AQUOS R11 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Sharp AQUOS R11

  • Stronger camera score: 68 vs 61
  • 319% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
  • 67% higher Refresh rate: 240 Hz vs 144 Hz
  • 57% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 32 MP
  • 11% lower weight: 195 g vs 219 g

Reasons to pick the Xiaomi 17T Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 85 vs 47
  • Stronger battery score: 95 vs 50
  • Stronger features score: 100 vs 73
  • 178% higher Wired charging: 100 W vs 36 W
  • 72% higher Optical zoom: 5 x vs 2.9 x

Display

Display comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Xiaomi 17T Pro
Screen size6.5 ″6.83 ″+5%
Panel typeLTPO Pro IGZO OLEDAMOLED
Resolution1080x23401280x2772
Pixel density396 ppi447 ppi+13%
Refresh rate240 Hz+67%144 Hz
Peak brightness3,600 nits+3%3,500 nits
Screen-to-body89.8 %91.1 %+1%

Performance

Performance comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Xiaomi 17T Pro
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu—3,182,664Top 10%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—911,618Top 10%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—1,228,396Top 9%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—401,602Top 17%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—641,048Top 11%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options256/512GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Xiaomi 17T Pro
Main camera50 MP+1%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.9f/1.67
Ultra-wide50 MP+319%12 MP
Telephoto39 MP50 MP+30%
Optical zoom2.9 x5 x+72%
Max video4K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera50 MP+57%32 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Xiaomi 17T Pro
Capacity5,100 mAh7,000 mAh+37%
Wired charging36 W100 W+178%
Wireless charging—50 W
Active use endurance—20.3 h

Design

Design comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Xiaomi 17T Pro
Weight195 g+11%219 g
Thickness8.9 mm8.3 mm+7%
IP ratingIP68/IP69IP68
Frame materialAluminumAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Xiaomi 17T Pro
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth6.06.0
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 3.2USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Xiaomi 17T Pro
OS at launchAndroid 16Android 16 (HyperOS 3)
OS update pledge3 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: Sharp AQUOS R11 versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
SpecSharp AQUOS R11Xiaomi 17T Pro
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup