Skip to content
InnoReviews

TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G vs vivo X200 Ultra

TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G
59.3Inno Score
VS
WINNER
vivo X200 Ultra
77.9Inno Score
46.7Performance74.3
72.2Display76.1
58.6Camera75.8
59Battery82.8
73.3Features86.7
2 spec wins — TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G5 spec wins — vivo X200 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

vivo X200 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 77.9 to 59.3, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+28) and battery (+24). TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G

  • 20% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 12% lower thickness: 7.7 mm vs 8.7 mm

Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 74 vs 47
  • Stronger display score: 76 vs 72
  • Stronger camera score: 76 vs 59
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 59
  • Stronger features score: 87 vs 73

Display

Display comparison: TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
Screen size6.78 ″6.82 ″+1%
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1080x24361440x3168
Pixel density393 ppi510 ppi+30%
Refresh rate144 Hz+20%120 Hz
Peak brightness—4,500 nits
Screen-to-body—90.2 %

Performance

Performance comparison: TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8200 UltimateQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Geekbench 6 (single)—3,062Top 12%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—9,410Top 11%
Wild Life Extreme stability—49 %Bottom 8%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options256/512GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.88f/1.69
Ultra-wide50 MP50 MP
Telephoto—200 MP
Optical zoom—3.7 x
Max video—8K@30fps
Front camera50 MP50 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
Capacity5,000 mAh6,000 mAh+20%
Wired charging70 W90 W+29%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—13.6 h

Design

Design comparison: TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
Weight—232 g
Thickness7.7 mm+12%8.7 mm
IP rating—IP68/IP69
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.25.4
NFC—Yes
USBUSB-CUSB-C 3.2
eSIM—No

Software

Software comparison: TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 14 (HiOS 14)Android 15 (OriginOS 5)

Audio

Audio comparison: TECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 30 Pro 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jack—No

Related comparisons

Try another matchup