Skip to content
InnoReviews

TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G vs Vivo X300 Ultra

TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G
64.3Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300 Ultra
88.1Inno Score
46.7Performance93.3
79.1Display82.3
69.3Camera84.6
60Battery91.5
86.7Features84
1 spec wins — TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G8 spec wins — Vivo X300 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 88.1 to 64.3, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+47) and battery (+32). TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 93 vs 47
  • Stronger display score: 82 vs 79
  • Stronger camera score: 85 vs 69
  • Stronger battery score: 92 vs 60
  • 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP

Display

Display comparison: TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5GVivo X300 Ultra
Screen size6.67 ″6.82 ″+2%
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1260x28001440x3168
Pixel density460 ppi510 ppi+11%
Refresh rate144 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness—4,500 nits
Screen-to-body—90.3 %

Performance

Performance comparison: TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5GVivo X300 Ultra
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8350 UltimateQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu—4,085,695
Geekbench 6 (single)—3,730Top 3%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—11,494Top 3%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5GVivo X300 Ultra
Main camera50 MP200 MP+300%
Main aperture—f/1.9
Ultra-wide50 MP50 MP
Telephoto50 MP200 MP+300%
Optical zoom3 x3.7 x+23%
Max video—8K@30fps
Front camera50 MP50 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5GVivo X300 Ultra
Capacity5,100 mAh6,600 mAh+29%
Wired charging70 W100 W+43%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—16 h

Design

Design comparison: TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5GVivo X300 Ultra
Weight—232 g
Thickness7.7 mm+6%8.2 mm
IP ratingIP68/IP69IP68/IP69
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5GVivo X300 Ultra
5GYesYes
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth—5.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB-C 3.2
eSIM—Yes

Software

Software comparison: TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5GVivo X300 Ultra
OS at launchHiOS 15 (Android 15)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge—5 years

Audio

Audio comparison: TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5GVivo X300 Ultra
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jack—No

Related comparisons

TECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5Gvs Huawei Mate XT 2 Ultimate DesignVSTECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5Gvs Samsung Galaxy S25VSTECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5Gvs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7VSTECNO CAMON 40 Premier 5Gvs Huawei Pura 90 ProVSVivo X300 Ultravs iQOO 15 UltraVSVivo X300 Ultravs OPPO Find X9 UltraVSVivo X300 Ultravs Honor Magic8 ProVSVivo X300 Ultravs realme GT 8 ProVS

Try another matchup