TECNO CAMON 40 vs vivo X200 Pro mini
28.9Performance71.3
60Display73.8
45.9Camera65.5
54.3Battery74.7
60Features86.7
2 spec wins — TECNO CAMON 406 spec wins — vivo X200 Pro mini
InnoReviews verdict
vivo X200 Pro mini wins this phone face-off, 72.8 to 46.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+42) and features (+27). TECNO CAMON 40 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the TECNO CAMON 40
- 10% lower thickness: 7.3 mm vs 8.2 mm
Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Pro mini
- Stronger performance score: 71 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 60
- Stronger camera score: 66 vs 46
- Stronger battery score: 75 vs 54
- Stronger features score: 87 vs 60
Display
| Spec | TECNO CAMON 40 | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.78 ″+7% | 6.31 ″ |
| Panel type | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 | 1216x2640 |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 460 ppi+17% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.5 % |
Performance
| Spec | TECNO CAMON 40 | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,439,691Top 28% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 716,503Top 28% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 837,229Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 328,282Top 35% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 557,677Top 24% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,589Top 21% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 8,078Top 18% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 48 %Bottom 7% |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | TECNO CAMON 40 | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | — | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 50 MP+525% |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | — | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | TECNO CAMON 40 | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,700 mAh+10% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W+100% |
| Wireless charging | — | 30 W |
Design
| Spec | TECNO CAMON 40 | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | — | 187 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+10% | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP66 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | — | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | TECNO CAMON 40 | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | — | No |
Software
| Spec | TECNO CAMON 40 | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | HiOS 15 (Android 15) | Android 15 (OriginOS 5) |
Audio
| Spec | TECNO CAMON 40 | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | — | No |
Related comparisons
TECNO CAMON 40vs realme 13 5GVSTECNO CAMON 40vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 UltraVSTECNO CAMON 40vs Tecno Spark 50 ProVSTECNO CAMON 40vs Infinix GT 30VSvivo X200 Pro minivs Google Pixel 11 Pro XLVSvivo X200 Pro minivs Huawei nova 16 UltraVSvivo X200 Pro minivs iPhone 17 Pro MaxVSvivo X200 Pro minivs iQOO 15RVS