Skip to content
InnoReviews

TECNO CAMON 40 vs vivo X200 Ultra

TECNO CAMON 40
46.7Inno Score
VS
WINNER
vivo X200 Ultra
77.9Inno Score
28.9Performance74.3
60Display76.1
45.9Camera75.8
54.3Battery82.8
60Features86.7
1 spec wins — TECNO CAMON 408 spec wins — vivo X200 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

vivo X200 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 77.9 to 46.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+45) and camera (+30). TECNO CAMON 40 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the TECNO CAMON 40

  • 16% lower thickness: 7.3 mm vs 8.7 mm

Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 74 vs 29
  • Stronger display score: 76 vs 60
  • Stronger camera score: 76 vs 46
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 54
  • Stronger features score: 87 vs 60

Display

Display comparison: TECNO CAMON 40 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 40vivo X200 Ultra
Screen size6.78 ″6.82 ″+1%
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1080x24361440x3168
Pixel density393 ppi510 ppi+30%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness—4,500 nits
Screen-to-body—90.2 %

Performance

Performance comparison: TECNO CAMON 40 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 40vivo X200 Ultra
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G100 UltimateQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Geekbench 6 (single)—3,062Top 12%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—9,410Top 11%
Wild Life Extreme stability—49 %Bottom 8%
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128/256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: TECNO CAMON 40 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 40vivo X200 Ultra
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperture—f/1.69
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto—200 MP
Optical zoom—3.7 x
Max video—8K@30fps
Front camera32 MP50 MP+56%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: TECNO CAMON 40 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 40vivo X200 Ultra
Capacity5,200 mAh6,000 mAh+15%
Wired charging45 W90 W+100%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—13.6 h

Design

Design comparison: TECNO CAMON 40 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 40vivo X200 Ultra
Weight—232 g
Thickness7.3 mm+16%8.7 mm
IP ratingIP66IP68/IP69
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: TECNO CAMON 40 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 40vivo X200 Ultra
5GNoYes
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth—5.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB-C 3.2
eSIM—No

Software

Software comparison: TECNO CAMON 40 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 40vivo X200 Ultra
OS at launchHiOS 15 (Android 15)Android 15 (OriginOS 5)

Audio

Audio comparison: TECNO CAMON 40 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 40vivo X200 Ultra
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jack—No

Related comparisons

Try another matchup