Skip to content
InnoReviews

TECNO CAMON 50 Pro vs vivo X200 Ultra

TECNO CAMON 50 Pro
52.8Inno Score
VS
WINNER
vivo X200 Ultra
77.9Inno Score
28.9Performance74.3
75.9Display76.1
56.6Camera75.8
63.3Battery82.8
49.3Features86.7
3 spec wins — TECNO CAMON 50 Pro9 spec wins — vivo X200 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

vivo X200 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 77.9 to 52.8, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+45) and features (+37). TECNO CAMON 50 Pro still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the TECNO CAMON 50 Pro

  • 20% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 15% lower thickness: 7.4 mm vs 8.7 mm

Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 74 vs 29
  • Stronger camera score: 76 vs 57
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 63
  • Stronger features score: 87 vs 49
  • 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP

Display

Display comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Pro versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Provivo X200 Ultra
Screen size6.78 ″6.82 ″+1%
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1208x26441440x3168
Pixel density429 ppi510 ppi+19%
Refresh rate144 Hz+20%120 Hz
Peak brightness—4,500 nits
Screen-to-body—90.2 %

Performance

Performance comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Pro versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Provivo X200 Ultra
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G200 UltimateQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Geekbench 6 (single)—3,062Top 12%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—9,410Top 11%
Wild Life Extreme stability—49 %Bottom 8%
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Pro versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Provivo X200 Ultra
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.69
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto50 MP200 MP+300%
Optical zoom3 x3.7 x+23%
Max video1080p8K@30fps
Front camera32 MP50 MP+56%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Pro versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Provivo X200 Ultra
Capacity6,150 mAh+3%6,000 mAh
Wired charging45 W90 W+100%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—13.6 h

Design

Design comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Pro versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Provivo X200 Ultra
Weight—232 g
Thickness7.4 mm+15%8.7 mm
IP ratingIP68/IP69/IP69KIP68/IP69
Frame materialPlasticAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Pro versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Provivo X200 Ultra
5GNoYes
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth—5.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB-C 3.2
eSIM—No

Software

Software comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Pro versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Provivo X200 Ultra
OS at launchHiOS 16Android 15 (OriginOS 5)
OS update pledge3 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Pro versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Provivo X200 Ultra
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jack—No

Related comparisons

TECNO CAMON 50 Provs OPPO K13 TurboVSTECNO CAMON 50 Provs Samsung Galaxy S23VSTECNO CAMON 50 Provs realme P2 Pro 5GVSTECNO CAMON 50 Provs Redmi Note 14SVSvivo X200 Ultravs OPPO Find N6VSvivo X200 Ultravs POCO F9 UltraVSvivo X200 Ultravs Vivo X Fold6VSvivo X200 Ultravs Honor Magic7 ProVS

Try another matchup