Skip to content
InnoReviews

TECNO CAMON 50 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra

TECNO CAMON 50 Pro
52.8Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300 Ultra
88.1Inno Score
28.9Performance93.3
75.9Display82.3
56.6Camera84.6
63.3Battery91.5
49.3Features84
1 spec wins — TECNO CAMON 50 Pro12 spec wins — Vivo X300 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 88.1 to 52.8, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+64) and features (+35). TECNO CAMON 50 Pro still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the TECNO CAMON 50 Pro

  • 10% lower thickness: 7.4 mm vs 8.2 mm

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 93 vs 29
  • Stronger display score: 82 vs 76
  • Stronger camera score: 85 vs 57
  • Stronger battery score: 92 vs 63
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 49

Display

Display comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Pro versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 ProVivo X300 Ultra
Screen size6.78 ″6.82 ″+1%
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1208x26441440x3168
Pixel density429 ppi510 ppi+19%
Refresh rate144 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness—4,500 nits
Screen-to-body—90.3 %

Performance

Performance comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Pro versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 ProVivo X300 Ultra
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G200 UltimateQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu—4,085,695
Geekbench 6 (single)—3,730Top 3%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—11,494Top 3%
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Pro versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 ProVivo X300 Ultra
Main camera50 MP200 MP+300%
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.9
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto50 MP200 MP+300%
Optical zoom3 x3.7 x+23%
Max video1080p8K@30fps
Front camera32 MP50 MP+56%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Pro versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 ProVivo X300 Ultra
Capacity6,150 mAh6,600 mAh+7%
Wired charging45 W100 W+122%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—16 h

Design

Design comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Pro versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 ProVivo X300 Ultra
Weight—232 g
Thickness7.4 mm+10%8.2 mm
IP ratingIP68/IP69/IP69KIP68/IP69
Frame materialPlasticAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Pro versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 ProVivo X300 Ultra
5GNoYes
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth—5.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB-C 3.2
eSIM—Yes

Software

Software comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Pro versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 ProVivo X300 Ultra
OS at launchHiOS 16Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge3 years5 years+67%

Audio

Audio comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Pro versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 ProVivo X300 Ultra
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jack—No

Related comparisons

Try another matchup