Skip to content
InnoReviews

TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G vs vivo X Fold5

TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G
55.7Inno Score
VS
WINNER
vivo X Fold5
66.9Inno Score
25.9Performance52.9
75.9Display71.7
60.5Camera63
66.6Battery80.9
73.3Features78.7
5 spec wins — TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G7 spec wins — vivo X Fold5

InnoReviews verdict

vivo X Fold5 wins this phone face-off, 66.9 to 55.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+27) and battery (+14). TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G

  • Stronger display score: 76 vs 72
  • 150% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 20 MP
  • 20% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 16% lower thickness: 7.8 mm vs 9.2 mm

Reasons to pick the vivo X Fold5

  • Stronger performance score: 53 vs 26
  • Stronger battery score: 81 vs 67
  • Stronger features score: 79 vs 73
  • 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP
  • 106% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 6,483 vs 3,148

Display

Display comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus vivo X Fold5
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvivo X Fold5
Screen size6.78 ″8.03 ″+18%
Panel typeAMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLED
Resolution1208x26442200x2480
Pixel density429 ppi+4%413 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz+20%120 Hz
Peak brightness—4,500 nits
Screen-to-body—90.9 %

Performance

Performance comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus vivo X Fold5
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvivo X Fold5
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7400 UltimateQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Geekbench 6 (single)1,057Bottom 39%2,154+104%Top 29%
Geekbench 6 (multi)3,148Bottom 43%6,483+106%Top 29%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options256/512GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus vivo X Fold5
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvivo X Fold5
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.57
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto50 MP50 MP
Optical zoom3 x3 x
Max video4K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera50 MP+150%20 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus vivo X Fold5
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvivo X Fold5
Capacity6,500 mAh+8%6,000 mAh
Wired charging45 W80 W+78%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—13.4 h

Design

Design comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus vivo X Fold5
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvivo X Fold5
Weight—217 g
Thickness7.8 mm+16%9.2 mm
IP ratingIP66/IP68/IP69/IP69KIP58/IP59
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus vivo X Fold5
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvivo X Fold5
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth—5.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB-C 3.2
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus vivo X Fold5
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvivo X Fold5
OS at launchHiOS 16 (Android 16)Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15, OriginOS 5 in China)
OS update pledge3 years4 years+33%

Audio

Audio comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus vivo X Fold5
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvivo X Fold5
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jack—No

Related comparisons

Try another matchup