Skip to content
InnoReviews

TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G vs vivo X200 Ultra

TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G
55.7Inno Score
VS
WINNER
vivo X200 Ultra
77.9Inno Score
25.9Performance74.3
75.9Display76.1
60.5Camera75.8
66.6Battery82.8
73.3Features86.7
4 spec wins — TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G9 spec wins — vivo X200 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

vivo X200 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 77.9 to 55.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+48) and battery (+16). TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G

  • 20% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 11% lower thickness: 7.8 mm vs 8.7 mm
  • Has eSIM — the other doesn't

Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 74 vs 26
  • Stronger camera score: 76 vs 61
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 67
  • Stronger features score: 87 vs 73
  • 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP

Display

Display comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
Screen size6.78 ″6.82 ″+1%
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1208x26441440x3168
Pixel density429 ppi510 ppi+19%
Refresh rate144 Hz+20%120 Hz
Peak brightness—4,500 nits
Screen-to-body—90.2 %

Performance

Performance comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7400 UltimateQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Geekbench 6 (single)1,057Bottom 39%3,062+190%Top 12%
Geekbench 6 (multi)3,148Bottom 43%9,410+199%Top 11%
Wild Life Extreme stability—49 %Bottom 8%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options256/512GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.69
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto50 MP200 MP+300%
Optical zoom3 x3.7 x+23%
Max video4K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera50 MP50 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
Capacity6,500 mAh+8%6,000 mAh
Wired charging45 W90 W+100%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—13.6 h

Design

Design comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
Weight—232 g
Thickness7.8 mm+11%8.7 mm
IP ratingIP66/IP68/IP69/IP69KIP68/IP69
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth—5.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB-C 3.2
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
OS at launchHiOS 16 (Android 16)Android 15 (OriginOS 5)
OS update pledge3 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: TECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO CAMON 50 Ultra 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jack—No

Related comparisons

Try another matchup