Skip to content
InnoReviews

Tecno Camon Slim 4G vs vivo X200 Pro mini

Tecno Camon Slim 4G
47.5Inno Score
VS
WINNER
vivo X200 Pro mini
72.8Inno Score
28.9Performance71.3
73Display73.8
34.1Camera65.5
62.4Battery74.7
49.3Features86.7
3 spec wins — Tecno Camon Slim 4G7 spec wins — vivo X200 Pro mini

InnoReviews verdict

vivo X200 Pro mini wins this phone face-off, 72.8 to 47.5, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+42) and features (+37). Tecno Camon Slim 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Tecno Camon Slim 4G

  • 22% lower thickness: 6.4 mm vs 8.2 mm
  • 20% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz

Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Pro mini

  • Stronger performance score: 71 vs 29
  • Stronger camera score: 66 vs 34
  • Stronger battery score: 75 vs 62
  • Stronger features score: 87 vs 49
  • 100% higher RAM (max): 16 GB vs 8 GB

Display

Display comparison: Tecno Camon Slim 4G versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecTecno Camon Slim 4Gvivo X200 Pro mini
Screen size6.78 ″+7%6.31 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1224x27201216x2640
Pixel density440 ppi460 ppi+5%
Refresh rate144 Hz+20%120 Hz
Peak brightness—4,500 nits
Screen-to-body87.7 %90.5 %+3%

Performance

Performance comparison: Tecno Camon Slim 4G versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecTecno Camon Slim 4Gvivo X200 Pro mini
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G200 UltimateMediaTek Dimensity 9400
AnTuTu—2,439,691Top 28%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—716,503Top 28%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—837,229Top 29%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—328,282Top 35%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—557,677Top 24%
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,589Top 21%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—8,078Top 18%
Wild Life Extreme stability—48 %Bottom 7%
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128/256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.0

Camera

Camera comparison: Tecno Camon Slim 4G versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecTecno Camon Slim 4Gvivo X200 Pro mini
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.57
Ultra-wide—50 MP
Telephoto—50 MP
Optical zoom—3 x
Max video—4K@60fps
Front camera32 MP32 MP
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Tecno Camon Slim 4G versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecTecno Camon Slim 4Gvivo X200 Pro mini
Capacity5,600 mAh5,700 mAh+2%
Wired charging60 W90 W+50%
Wireless charging—30 W

Design

Design comparison: Tecno Camon Slim 4G versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecTecno Camon Slim 4Gvivo X200 Pro mini
Weight—187 g
Thickness6.4 mm+22%8.2 mm
IP ratingIP68/IP69IP68/IP69
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Tecno Camon Slim 4G versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecTecno Camon Slim 4Gvivo X200 Pro mini
5GNoYes
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth—5.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIM—No

Software

Software comparison: Tecno Camon Slim 4G versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecTecno Camon Slim 4Gvivo X200 Pro mini
OS at launchAndroid 16 (HiOS 16.2)Android 15 (OriginOS 5)
OS update pledge3 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: Tecno Camon Slim 4G versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecTecno Camon Slim 4Gvivo X200 Pro mini
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup