Skip to content
InnoReviews

Tecno Camon Slim 4G vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

Tecno Camon Slim 4G
47.5Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

Xiaomi

Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

$1,199

57.6Inno Score
28.9Performance40.8
73Display57.6
34.1Camera66.4
62.4Battery70.2
49.3Features65.3
4 spec wins — Tecno Camon Slim 4G6 spec wins — Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 57.6 to 47.5, pulling ahead mainly in camera (+32) and features (+16). Tecno Camon Slim 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Tecno Camon Slim 4G

  • Stronger display score: 73 vs 58
  • 60% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 20 MP
  • 24% lower thickness: 6.4 mm vs 8.4 mm
  • 20% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 12% higher capacity: 5,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh

Reasons to pick the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 41 vs 29
  • Stronger camera score: 66 vs 34
  • Stronger battery score: 70 vs 62
  • Stronger features score: 65 vs 49
  • 50% higher RAM (max): 12 GB vs 8 GB

Display

Display comparison: Tecno Camon Slim 4G versus Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
SpecTecno Camon Slim 4GXiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Screen size6.78 ″6.81 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO OLED
Resolution1224x27203200x1440
Pixel density440 ppi515 ppi+17%
Refresh rate144 Hz+20%120 Hz
Peak brightness—1,700 nits
Screen-to-body87.7 %—

Performance

Performance comparison: Tecno Camon Slim 4G versus Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
SpecTecno Camon Slim 4GXiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G200 UltimateSnapdragon 888
AnTuTu—1,040,324
Geekbench 6 (single)—1,450Top 44%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—3,650Top 50%
RAM (max)8 GB12 GB+50%
Storage options128/256GB256GB / 512GB
Storage type—UFS 3.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Tecno Camon Slim 4G versus Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
SpecTecno Camon Slim 4GXiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/2.0
Ultra-wide—48 MP
Telephoto—48 MP
Optical zoom—5 x
Max video—8K@24fps
Front camera32 MP+60%20 MP
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Tecno Camon Slim 4G versus Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
SpecTecno Camon Slim 4GXiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Capacity5,600 mAh+12%5,000 mAh
Wired charging60 W67 W+12%
Wireless charging—67 W

Design

Design comparison: Tecno Camon Slim 4G versus Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
SpecTecno Camon Slim 4GXiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Weight—234 g
Thickness6.4 mm+24%8.4 mm
IP ratingIP68/IP69IP68
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Tecno Camon Slim 4G versus Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
SpecTecno Camon Slim 4GXiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
5GNoYes
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth—5.2
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIM—No

Software

Software comparison: Tecno Camon Slim 4G versus Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
SpecTecno Camon Slim 4GXiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 16 (HiOS 16.2)Android 11 (MIUI 12)
OS update pledge3 years3 years

Audio

Audio comparison: Tecno Camon Slim 4G versus Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
SpecTecno Camon Slim 4GXiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup