Skip to content
InnoReviews

TECNO POVA Curve 2 5G vs Vivo X300 Ultra

TECNO POVA Curve 2 5G
53.9Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300 Ultra
88.1Inno Score
46.7Performance93.3
75.9Display82.3
30.1Camera84.6
71.3Battery91.5
44Features84
3 spec wins — TECNO POVA Curve 2 5G8 spec wins — Vivo X300 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 88.1 to 53.9, pulling ahead mainly in camera (+54) and performance (+47). TECNO POVA Curve 2 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the TECNO POVA Curve 2 5G

  • 21% higher capacity: 8,000 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • 16% lower weight: 195 g vs 232 g

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 93 vs 47
  • Stronger display score: 82 vs 76
  • Stronger camera score: 85 vs 30
  • Stronger battery score: 92 vs 71
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 44

Display

Display comparison: TECNO POVA Curve 2 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO POVA Curve 2 5GVivo X300 Ultra
Screen size6.78 ″6.82 ″+1%
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1080x23641440x3168
Pixel density383 ppi510 ppi+33%
Refresh rate144 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits4,500 nits
Screen-to-body—90.3 %

Performance

Performance comparison: TECNO POVA Curve 2 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO POVA Curve 2 5GVivo X300 Ultra
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7100Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu—4,085,695
Geekbench 6 (single)—3,730Top 3%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—11,494Top 3%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options128/256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: TECNO POVA Curve 2 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO POVA Curve 2 5GVivo X300 Ultra
Main camera50 MP200 MP+300%
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.9
Ultra-wide—50 MP
Telephoto—200 MP
Optical zoom—3.7 x
Max video1440p@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera13 MP50 MP+285%
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: TECNO POVA Curve 2 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO POVA Curve 2 5GVivo X300 Ultra
Capacity8,000 mAh+21%6,600 mAh
Wired charging45 W100 W+122%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—16 h

Design

Design comparison: TECNO POVA Curve 2 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO POVA Curve 2 5GVivo X300 Ultra
Weight195 g+16%232 g
Thickness7.4 mm+9%8.2 mm
IP ratingIP64IP68/IP69
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: TECNO POVA Curve 2 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO POVA Curve 2 5GVivo X300 Ultra
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIM—Yes

Software

Software comparison: TECNO POVA Curve 2 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO POVA Curve 2 5GVivo X300 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 16 (HiOS 16)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge2 years5 years+150%

Audio

Audio comparison: TECNO POVA Curve 2 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO POVA Curve 2 5GVivo X300 Ultra
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

TECNO POVA Curve 2 5Gvs realme P4 Power 5GVSTECNO POVA Curve 2 5Gvs Samsung Galaxy S21 UltraVSTECNO POVA Curve 2 5Gvs Motorola Edge 50 ProVSTECNO POVA Curve 2 5Gvs iPhone 16eVSVivo X300 Ultravs iQOO 15 UltraVSVivo X300 Ultravs OPPO Find X9 UltraVSVivo X300 Ultravs Honor Magic8 ProVSVivo X300 Ultravs realme GT 8 ProVS

Try another matchup