Skip to content
InnoReviews

TECNO POVA Slim 5G vs Vivo X300

TECNO POVA Slim 5G
43.6Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300
81.8Inno Score
21.8Performance85.4
79.4Display73.5
30.1Camera78.1
54Battery87.2
44Features84
4 spec wins — TECNO POVA Slim 5G10 spec wins — Vivo X300

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 wins this phone face-off, 81.8 to 43.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+64) and camera (+48). TECNO POVA Slim 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the TECNO POVA Slim 5G

  • Stronger display score: 79 vs 74
  • 25% lower thickness: 6 mm vs 8 mm
  • 20% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 18% lower weight: 156 g vs 190 g

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300

  • Stronger performance score: 85 vs 22
  • Stronger camera score: 78 vs 30
  • Stronger battery score: 87 vs 54
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 44
  • 443% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 9,843 vs 1,813

Display

Display comparison: TECNO POVA Slim 5G versus Vivo X300
SpecTECNO POVA Slim 5GVivo X300
Screen size6.78 ″+7%6.31 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1224x27201216x2640
Pixel density440 ppi461 ppi+5%
Refresh rate144 Hz+20%120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits4,500 nits
Screen-to-body—90.1 %

Performance

Performance comparison: TECNO POVA Slim 5G versus Vivo X300
SpecTECNO POVA Slim 5GVivo X300
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 6400MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu—3,416,530
Geekbench 6 (single)658Bottom 11%3,446+424%Top 7%
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,813Bottom 11%9,843+443%Top 8%
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128/256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: TECNO POVA Slim 5G versus Vivo X300
SpecTECNO POVA Slim 5GVivo X300
Main camera50 MP200 MP+300%
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.68
Ultra-wide—50 MP
Telephoto—50 MP
Optical zoom—3 x
Max video1440p@30fps4K@120fps
Front camera13 MP50 MP+285%
OIS—Yes

Battery

Battery comparison: TECNO POVA Slim 5G versus Vivo X300
SpecTECNO POVA Slim 5GVivo X300
Capacity5,160 mAh6,040 mAh+17%
Wired charging45 W90 W+100%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—17.5 h

Design

Design comparison: TECNO POVA Slim 5G versus Vivo X300
SpecTECNO POVA Slim 5GVivo X300
Weight156 g+18%190 g
Thickness6 mm+25%8 mm
IP ratingIP64IP68/IP69
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: TECNO POVA Slim 5G versus Vivo X300
SpecTECNO POVA Slim 5GVivo X300
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB-C 3.2
eSIM—Yes

Software

Software comparison: TECNO POVA Slim 5G versus Vivo X300
SpecTECNO POVA Slim 5GVivo X300
OS at launchHiOS 15 (Android 15)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge1 years5 years+400%

Audio

Audio comparison: TECNO POVA Slim 5G versus Vivo X300
SpecTECNO POVA Slim 5GVivo X300
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup