Skip to content
InnoReviews

TECNO SPARK 30 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra

TECNO SPARK 30 Pro
41.3Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300 Ultra
88.1Inno Score
28.9Performance93.3
50.1Display82.3
34.9Camera84.6
47.8Battery91.5
60Features84
3 spec wins — TECNO SPARK 30 Pro10 spec wins — Vivo X300 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 88.1 to 41.3, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+64) and camera (+50). TECNO SPARK 30 Pro still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the TECNO SPARK 30 Pro

  • 19% lower weight: 188 g vs 232 g
  • 10% lower thickness: 7.4 mm vs 8.2 mm
  • Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 93 vs 29
  • Stronger display score: 82 vs 50
  • Stronger camera score: 85 vs 35
  • Stronger battery score: 92 vs 48
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 60

Display

Display comparison: TECNO SPARK 30 Pro versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO SPARK 30 ProVivo X300 Ultra
Screen size6.78 ″6.82 ″+1%
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1080x24361440x3168
Pixel density393 ppi510 ppi+30%
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz+20%
Peak brightness1,700 nits4,500 nits+165%
Screen-to-body—90.3 %

Performance

Performance comparison: TECNO SPARK 30 Pro versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO SPARK 30 ProVivo X300 Ultra
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G100Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu—4,085,695
Geekbench 6 (single)—3,730Top 3%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—11,494Top 3%
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128/256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: TECNO SPARK 30 Pro versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO SPARK 30 ProVivo X300 Ultra
Main camera108 MP200 MP+85%
Main aperture—f/1.9
Ultra-wide—50 MP
Telephoto—200 MP
Optical zoom—3.7 x
Max video—8K@30fps
Front camera13 MP50 MP+285%
OIS—Yes

Battery

Battery comparison: TECNO SPARK 30 Pro versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO SPARK 30 ProVivo X300 Ultra
Capacity5,000 mAh6,600 mAh+32%
Wired charging33 W100 W+203%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—16 h

Design

Design comparison: TECNO SPARK 30 Pro versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO SPARK 30 ProVivo X300 Ultra
Weight188 g+19%232 g
Thickness7.4 mm+10%8.2 mm
IP ratingIP54IP68/IP69
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: TECNO SPARK 30 Pro versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO SPARK 30 ProVivo X300 Ultra
5GNoYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB-C 3.2
eSIM—Yes

Software

Software comparison: TECNO SPARK 30 Pro versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO SPARK 30 ProVivo X300 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 14 (HiOS 14)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge—5 years

Audio

Audio comparison: TECNO SPARK 30 Pro versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecTECNO SPARK 30 ProVivo X300 Ultra
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackYesNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup