Skip to content
InnoReviews

TECNO SPARK 30 vs vivo X200 Ultra

TECNO SPARK 30
33.6Inno Score
VS
WINNER
vivo X200 Ultra
77.9Inno Score
21.8Performance74.3
35.1Display76.1
31.6Camera75.8
38.8Battery82.8
60Features86.7
3 spec wins — TECNO SPARK 3011 spec wins — vivo X200 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

vivo X200 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 77.9 to 33.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+53) and camera (+44). TECNO SPARK 30 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the TECNO SPARK 30

  • 28% higher Main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP
  • 11% lower thickness: 7.7 mm vs 8.7 mm
  • Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't

Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 74 vs 22
  • Stronger display score: 76 vs 35
  • Stronger camera score: 76 vs 32
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 39
  • Stronger features score: 87 vs 60

Display

Display comparison: TECNO SPARK 30 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO SPARK 30vivo X200 Ultra
Screen size6.78 ″6.82 ″+1%
Panel type—LTPO AMOLED
Resolution1080x24601440x3168
Pixel density396 ppi510 ppi+29%
Refresh rate90 Hz120 Hz+33%
Peak brightness800 nits4,500 nits+463%
Screen-to-body—90.2 %

Performance

Performance comparison: TECNO SPARK 30 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO SPARK 30vivo X200 Ultra
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G91Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Geekbench 6 (single)445Bottom 8%3,062+588%Top 12%
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,440Bottom 7%9,410+553%Top 11%
Wild Life Extreme stability—49 %Bottom 8%
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128/256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: TECNO SPARK 30 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO SPARK 30vivo X200 Ultra
Main camera64 MP+28%50 MP
Main aperture—f/1.69
Ultra-wide—50 MP
Telephoto—200 MP
Optical zoom—3.7 x
Max video1440p@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera13 MP50 MP+285%
OIS—Yes

Battery

Battery comparison: TECNO SPARK 30 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO SPARK 30vivo X200 Ultra
Capacity5,000 mAh6,000 mAh+20%
Wired charging18 W90 W+400%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—13.6 h

Design

Design comparison: TECNO SPARK 30 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO SPARK 30vivo X200 Ultra
Weight—232 g
Thickness7.7 mm+11%8.7 mm
IP ratingIP64IP68/IP69
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: TECNO SPARK 30 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO SPARK 30vivo X200 Ultra
5GNoYes
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth—5.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-CUSB-C 3.2
eSIM—No

Software

Software comparison: TECNO SPARK 30 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO SPARK 30vivo X200 Ultra
OS at launchHiOS 14 (Android 14)Android 15 (OriginOS 5)

Audio

Audio comparison: TECNO SPARK 30 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO SPARK 30vivo X200 Ultra
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackYesNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup