Skip to content
InnoReviews

TECNO SPARK 40 Pro vs vivo X200 Ultra

TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
47.1Inno Score
VS
WINNER
vivo X200 Ultra
77.9Inno Score
28.9Performance74.3
77.8Display76.1
30.1Camera75.8
54.3Battery82.8
60Features86.7
3 spec wins — TECNO SPARK 40 Pro8 spec wins — vivo X200 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

vivo X200 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 77.9 to 47.1, pulling ahead mainly in camera (+46) and performance (+45). TECNO SPARK 40 Pro still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the TECNO SPARK 40 Pro

  • 27% lower weight: 170 g vs 232 g
  • 23% lower thickness: 6.7 mm vs 8.7 mm
  • 20% higher Refresh rate: 144 Hz vs 120 Hz

Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 74 vs 29
  • Stronger camera score: 76 vs 30
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 54
  • Stronger features score: 87 vs 60
  • 285% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 13 MP

Display

Display comparison: TECNO SPARK 40 Pro versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO SPARK 40 Provivo X200 Ultra
Screen size6.78 ″6.82 ″+1%
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1224x27201440x3168
Pixel density440 ppi510 ppi+16%
Refresh rate144 Hz+20%120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits4,500 nits
Screen-to-body89.3 %90.2 %+1%

Performance

Performance comparison: TECNO SPARK 40 Pro versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO SPARK 40 Provivo X200 Ultra
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G100 UltimateQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Geekbench 6 (single)—3,062Top 12%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—9,410Top 11%
Wild Life Extreme stability—49 %Bottom 8%
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128/256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: TECNO SPARK 40 Pro versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO SPARK 40 Provivo X200 Ultra
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperture—f/1.69
Ultra-wide—50 MP
Telephoto—200 MP
Optical zoom—3.7 x
Max video1440p@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera13 MP50 MP+285%
OIS—Yes

Battery

Battery comparison: TECNO SPARK 40 Pro versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO SPARK 40 Provivo X200 Ultra
Capacity5,200 mAh6,000 mAh+15%
Wired charging45 W90 W+100%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—13.6 h

Design

Design comparison: TECNO SPARK 40 Pro versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO SPARK 40 Provivo X200 Ultra
Weight170 g+27%232 g
Thickness6.7 mm+23%8.7 mm
IP ratingIP64IP68/IP69
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: TECNO SPARK 40 Pro versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO SPARK 40 Provivo X200 Ultra
5GNoYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth—5.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIM—No

Software

Software comparison: TECNO SPARK 40 Pro versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO SPARK 40 Provivo X200 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 15 (HiOS 15)Android 15 (OriginOS 5)

Audio

Audio comparison: TECNO SPARK 40 Pro versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecTECNO SPARK 40 Provivo X200 Ultra
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jack—No

Related comparisons

TECNO SPARK 40 Provs Infinix NOTE 40X 5GVSTECNO SPARK 40 Provs Infinix NOTE 50VSTECNO SPARK 40 Provs vivo V50 LiteVSTECNO SPARK 40 Provs iPhone 13 ProVSvivo X200 Ultravs OPPO Find N6VSvivo X200 Ultravs POCO F9 UltraVSvivo X200 Ultravs Vivo X Fold6VSvivo X200 Ultravs Honor Magic7 ProVS

Try another matchup