TECNO SPARK 40 Pro vs Xiaomi 17T Pro
28.9Performance84.8
77.8Display74.1
30.1Camera61.4
54.3Battery95
60Features100
3 spec wins — TECNO SPARK 40 Pro8 spec wins — Xiaomi 17T Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Xiaomi 17T Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.5 to 47.1, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+56) and battery (+41). TECNO SPARK 40 Pro still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the TECNO SPARK 40 Pro
- Stronger display score: 78 vs 74
- 29% higher Peak brightness: 4,500 nits vs 3,500 nits
- 22% lower weight: 170 g vs 219 g
- 19% lower thickness: 6.7 mm vs 8.3 mm
Reasons to pick the Xiaomi 17T Pro
- Stronger performance score: 85 vs 29
- Stronger camera score: 61 vs 30
- Stronger battery score: 95 vs 54
- Stronger features score: 100 vs 60
- 146% higher Front camera: 32 MP vs 13 MP
Display
| Spec | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro | Xiaomi 17T Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.78 ″ | 6.83 ″+1% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 1280x2772 |
| Pixel density | 440 ppi | 447 ppi+2% |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits+29% | 3,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 89.3 % | 91.1 %+2% |
Performance
| Spec | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro | Xiaomi 17T Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| AnTuTu | — | 3,182,664Top 10% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 911,618Top 10% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 1,228,396Top 9% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 401,602Top 17% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 641,048Top 11% |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro | Xiaomi 17T Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | — | f/1.67 |
| Ultra-wide | — | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 5 x |
| Max video | 1440p@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP+146% |
| OIS | — | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro | Xiaomi 17T Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,200 mAh | 7,000 mAh+35% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 100 W+122% |
| Wireless charging | — | 50 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 20.3 h |
Design
| Spec | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro | Xiaomi 17T Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 170 g+22% | 219 g |
| Thickness | 6.7 mm+19% | 8.3 mm |
| IP rating | IP64 | IP68 |
| Frame material | — | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro | Xiaomi 17T Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | — | 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | — | Yes |
Software
| Spec | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro | Xiaomi 17T Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (HiOS 15) | Android 16 (HyperOS 3) |
Audio
| Spec | TECNO SPARK 40 Pro | Xiaomi 17T Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | — | No |
Related comparisons
TECNO SPARK 40 Provs Infinix NOTE 40X 5GVSTECNO SPARK 40 Provs Infinix NOTE 50VSTECNO SPARK 40 Provs vivo V50 LiteVSTECNO SPARK 40 Provs iPhone 13 ProVSXiaomi 17T Provs OnePlus 15VSXiaomi 17T Provs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVSXiaomi 17T Provs Xiaomi 17 UltraVSXiaomi 17T Provs OPPO Find X9 ProVS