Vivo X200 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
74.5Performance40.8
73.2Display57.6
72Camera66.4
79.9Battery70.2
78.7Features65.3
13 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro5 spec wins — Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X200 Pro wins this phone face-off, 75.2 to 57.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+34) and display (+16). Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 75 vs 41
- Stronger display score: 73 vs 58
- Stronger camera score: 72 vs 66
- Stronger battery score: 80 vs 70
- Stronger features score: 79 vs 65
Reasons to pick the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
- 123% higher Wireless charging: 67 W vs 30 W
- 35% higher Optical zoom: 5 x vs 3.7 x
- 14% higher Pixel density: 515 ppi vs 452 ppi
Display
| Spec | Vivo X200 Pro | Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.78 ″ | 6.81 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO OLED |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 3200x1440 |
| Pixel density | 452 ppi | 515 ppi+14% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits+165% | 1,700 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 90.3 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | Vivo X200 Pro | Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | Snapdragon 888 |
| AnTuTu 10 | 2,550,000+145%Top 6% | 1,040,324Top 46% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,800+93%Top 12% | 1,450Top 48% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,600+136%Top 8% | 3,650Top 53% |
| RAM (max) | 16 GB+33% | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256/512GB/1TB | 256GB / 512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Vivo X200 Pro | Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.57 | f/2.0 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP+4% | 48 MP |
| Telephoto | 200 MP+317% | 48 MP |
| Optical zoom | 3.7 x | 5 x+35% |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@24fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP+60% | 20 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Vivo X200 Pro | Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 6,000 mAh+20% | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 90 W+34% | 67 W |
| Wireless charging | 30 W | 67 W+123% |
| Active use endurance | 13 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Vivo X200 Pro | Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 223 g+5% | 234 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8.4 mm+1% |
| IP rating | IP68/IP69 | IP68 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Vivo X200 Pro | Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Vivo X200 Pro | Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) | Android 11 (MIUI 12) |
| OS update pledge | 4 years+33% | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | Vivo X200 Pro | Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Vivo X200 Provs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSVivo X200 Provs Xiaomi 15 UltraVSVivo X200 Provs Samsung Galaxy S26 UltraVSVivo X200 Provs OnePlus 13VSXiaomi Mi 11 Ultravs Samsung Galaxy S22 UltraVSXiaomi Mi 11 Ultravs OnePlus Nord 4VSXiaomi Mi 11 Ultravs Xiaomi 12 ProVSXiaomi Mi 11 Ultravs Samsung Galaxy S24VS