Skip to content
InnoReviews

vivo X200 vs Xiaomi 17T Pro

vivo X200
68.5Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Xiaomi 17T Pro
81.5Inno Score
64.4Performance84.8
73.3Display74.1
65.5Camera61.4
70.3Battery95
73.3Features100
5 spec wins — vivo X2005 spec wins — Xiaomi 17T Pro

InnoReviews verdict

Xiaomi 17T Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.5 to 68.5, pulling ahead mainly in features (+27) and battery (+25). vivo X200 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the vivo X200

  • Stronger camera score: 66 vs 61
  • 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP
  • 29% higher Peak brightness: 4,500 nits vs 3,500 nits
  • 10% lower weight: 197 g vs 219 g

Reasons to pick the Xiaomi 17T Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 85 vs 64
  • Stronger battery score: 95 vs 70
  • Stronger features score: 100 vs 73
  • 67% higher Optical zoom: 5 x vs 3 x
  • 21% higher capacity: 7,000 mAh vs 5,800 mAh

Display

Display comparison: vivo X200 versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
Specvivo X200Xiaomi 17T Pro
Screen size6.67 ″6.83 ″+2%
Panel typeAMOLEDAMOLED
Resolution1260x28001280x2772
Pixel density460 ppi+3%447 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz+20%
Peak brightness4,500 nits+29%3,500 nits
Screen-to-body—91.1 %

Performance

Performance comparison: vivo X200 versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
Specvivo X200Xiaomi 17T Pro
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu—3,182,664Top 10%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—911,618Top 10%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—1,228,396Top 9%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—401,602Top 17%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—641,048Top 11%
RAM (max)16 GB16 GB
Storage options256/512GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: vivo X200 versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
Specvivo X200Xiaomi 17T Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.57f/1.67
Ultra-wide50 MP+317%12 MP
Telephoto50 MP50 MP
Optical zoom3 x5 x+67%
Max video4K@60fps8K@30fps
Front camera32 MP32 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: vivo X200 versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
Specvivo X200Xiaomi 17T Pro
Capacity5,800 mAh7,000 mAh+21%
Wired charging90 W100 W+11%
Wireless charging—50 W
Active use endurance—20.3 h

Design

Design comparison: vivo X200 versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
Specvivo X200Xiaomi 17T Pro
Weight197 g+10%219 g
Thickness8 mm+3%8.3 mm
IP ratingIP68/IP69IP68
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: vivo X200 versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
Specvivo X200Xiaomi 17T Pro
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46.0
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: vivo X200 versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
Specvivo X200Xiaomi 17T Pro
OS at launchAndroid 15 (Funtouch OS 15)Android 16 (HyperOS 3)

Audio

Audio comparison: vivo X200 versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
Specvivo X200Xiaomi 17T Pro
Stereo speakers—Yes
3.5mm jack—No

Related comparisons

Try another matchup