Skip to content
InnoReviews

Vivo X300 E vs Xiaomi 17T Pro

Vivo X300 E
67.9Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Xiaomi 17T Pro
81.5Inno Score
46.7Performance84.8
84Display74.1
60.5Camera61.4
81.6Battery95
86.7Features100
6 spec wins — Vivo X300 E6 spec wins — Xiaomi 17T Pro

InnoReviews verdict

Xiaomi 17T Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.5 to 67.9, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+38) and battery (+13). Vivo X300 E still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 E

  • Stronger display score: 84 vs 74
  • 56% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 32 MP
  • 43% higher Peak brightness: 5,000 nits vs 3,500 nits

Reasons to pick the Xiaomi 17T Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 85 vs 47
  • Stronger battery score: 95 vs 82
  • Stronger features score: 100 vs 87
  • 67% higher Optical zoom: 5 x vs 3 x
  • 50% higher ultra-wide: 12 MP vs 8 MP

Display

Display comparison: Vivo X300 E versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
SpecVivo X300 EXiaomi 17T Pro
Screen size6.59 ″6.83 ″+4%
Panel typeAMOLEDAMOLED
Resolution1260x27501280x2772
Pixel density459 ppi+3%447 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness5,000 nits+43%3,500 nits
Screen-to-body—91.1 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Vivo X300 E versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
SpecVivo X300 EXiaomi 17T Pro
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu—3,182,664Top 10%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—911,618Top 10%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—1,228,396Top 9%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—401,602Top 17%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—641,048Top 11%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options256/512GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Vivo X300 E versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
SpecVivo X300 EXiaomi 17T Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.9f/1.67
Ultra-wide8 MP12 MP+50%
Telephoto50 MP50 MP
Optical zoom3 x5 x+67%
Max video—8K@30fps
Front camera50 MP+56%32 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Vivo X300 E versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
SpecVivo X300 EXiaomi 17T Pro
Capacity7,200 mAh+3%7,000 mAh
Wired charging90 W100 W+11%
Wireless charging—50 W
Active use endurance—20.3 h

Design

Design comparison: Vivo X300 E versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
SpecVivo X300 EXiaomi 17T Pro
Weight200 g+9%219 g
Thickness7.8 mm+5%8.3 mm
IP ratingIP68/IP69IP68
Frame materialAluminumAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Vivo X300 E versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
SpecVivo X300 EXiaomi 17T Pro
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46.0
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: Vivo X300 E versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
SpecVivo X300 EXiaomi 17T Pro
OS at launchAndroid 16 (OriginOS 6)Android 16 (HyperOS 3)

Audio

Audio comparison: Vivo X300 E versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
SpecVivo X300 EXiaomi 17T Pro
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup