Skip to content
InnoReviews

vivo X300 FE vs Xiaomi 17T Pro

vivo X300 FE
73Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Xiaomi 17T Pro
81.5Inno Score
67.9Performance84.8
76.7Display74.1
60.5Camera61.4
84Battery95
84Features100
5 spec wins — vivo X300 FE8 spec wins — Xiaomi 17T Pro

InnoReviews verdict

Xiaomi 17T Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.5 to 73, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+17) and features (+16). vivo X300 FE still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the vivo X300 FE

  • 56% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 32 MP
  • 43% higher Peak brightness: 5,000 nits vs 3,500 nits
  • 13% lower weight: 191 g vs 219 g

Reasons to pick the Xiaomi 17T Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 85 vs 68
  • Stronger battery score: 95 vs 84
  • Stronger features score: 100 vs 84
  • 67% higher Optical zoom: 5 x vs 3 x
  • 50% higher ultra-wide: 12 MP vs 8 MP

Display

Display comparison: vivo X300 FE versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
Specvivo X300 FEXiaomi 17T Pro
Screen size6.31 ″6.83 ″+8%
Panel typeAMOLEDAMOLED
Resolution1216x26401280x2772
Pixel density460 ppi+3%447 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz+20%
Peak brightness5,000 nits+43%3,500 nits
Screen-to-body—91.1 %

Performance

Performance comparison: vivo X300 FE versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
Specvivo X300 FEXiaomi 17T Pro
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu—3,182,664Top 10%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—911,618Top 10%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—1,228,396Top 9%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—401,602Top 17%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—641,048Top 11%
Geekbench 6 (single)2,857Top 18%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)9,276Top 13%—
Wild Life Extreme stability77 %Bottom 45%—
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options256/512GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: vivo X300 FE versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
Specvivo X300 FEXiaomi 17T Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.57f/1.67
Ultra-wide8 MP12 MP+50%
Telephoto50 MP50 MP
Optical zoom3 x5 x+67%
Max video8K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera50 MP+56%32 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: vivo X300 FE versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
Specvivo X300 FEXiaomi 17T Pro
Capacity6,500 mAh7,000 mAh+8%
Wired charging90 W100 W+11%
Wireless charging40 W50 W+25%
Active use endurance—20.3 h

Design

Design comparison: vivo X300 FE versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
Specvivo X300 FEXiaomi 17T Pro
Weight191 g+13%219 g
Thickness8 mm+3%8.3 mm
IP ratingIP68/IP69IP68
Frame materialAluminumAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: vivo X300 FE versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
Specvivo X300 FEXiaomi 17T Pro
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth6.06.0
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: vivo X300 FE versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
Specvivo X300 FEXiaomi 17T Pro
OS at launchAndroid 16 (OriginOS 6)Android 16 (HyperOS 3)
OS update pledge5 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: vivo X300 FE versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
Specvivo X300 FEXiaomi 17T Pro
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup