Skip to content
InnoReviews

Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Pro

WINNER
Vivo X300 Ultra
88.1Inno Score
VS
Xiaomi 17 Pro
76.6Inno Score
93.3Performance75.8
82.3Display67.4
84.6Camera73.3
91.5Battery85.4
84Features86.7
11 spec wins — Vivo X300 Ultra4 spec wins — Xiaomi 17 Pro

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 88.1 to 76.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+18) and display (+15). Xiaomi 17 Pro still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 93 vs 76
  • Stronger display score: 82 vs 67
  • Stronger camera score: 85 vs 73
  • Stronger battery score: 92 vs 85
  • 300% higher Main camera: 200 MP vs 50 MP

Reasons to pick the Xiaomi 17 Pro

  • 35% higher Optical zoom: 5 x vs 3.7 x
  • 25% higher Wireless charging: 50 W vs 40 W
  • 17% lower weight: 192 g vs 232 g

Display

Display comparison: Vivo X300 Ultra versus Xiaomi 17 Pro
SpecVivo X300 UltraXiaomi 17 Pro
Screen size6.82 ″+8%6.3 ″
Panel typeLTPO AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1440x31681220x2656
Pixel density510 ppi+10%464 ppi
Refresh rate144 Hz+20%120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits+29%3,500 nits
Screen-to-body90.3 %+1%89.5 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Vivo X300 Ultra versus Xiaomi 17 Pro
SpecVivo X300 UltraXiaomi 17 Pro
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu4,085,695—
Geekbench 6 (single)3,730+13%Top 3%3,289Top 9%
Geekbench 6 (multi)11,494+26%Top 3%9,111Top 14%
RAM (max)16 GB16 GB
Storage options256/512GB/1TB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Vivo X300 Ultra versus Xiaomi 17 Pro
SpecVivo X300 UltraXiaomi 17 Pro
Main camera200 MP+300%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.9f/1.7
Ultra-wide50 MP50 MP
Telephoto200 MP+300%50 MP
Optical zoom3.7 x5 x+35%
Max video8K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera50 MP50 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Vivo X300 Ultra versus Xiaomi 17 Pro
SpecVivo X300 UltraXiaomi 17 Pro
Capacity6,600 mAh+5%6,300 mAh
Wired charging100 W100 W
Wireless charging40 W50 W+25%
Active use endurance16 h—

Design

Design comparison: Vivo X300 Ultra versus Xiaomi 17 Pro
SpecVivo X300 UltraXiaomi 17 Pro
Weight232 g192 g+17%
Thickness8.2 mm8 mm+2%
IP ratingIP68/IP69IP68
Frame materialAluminumAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Vivo X300 Ultra versus Xiaomi 17 Pro
SpecVivo X300 UltraXiaomi 17 Pro
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 3.2USB-C 3.2
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: Vivo X300 Ultra versus Xiaomi 17 Pro
SpecVivo X300 UltraXiaomi 17 Pro
OS at launchAndroid 16 (OriginOS 6)Android 16 (HyperOS 3)
OS update pledge5 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: Vivo X300 Ultra versus Xiaomi 17 Pro
SpecVivo X300 UltraXiaomi 17 Pro
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup