Skip to content
InnoReviews

Vivo Y500 (4G) vs Xiaomi 17T Pro

Vivo Y500 (4G)
49.5Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Xiaomi 17T Pro
81.5Inno Score
28.9Performance84.8
75.9Display74.1
34.1Camera61.4
70.9Battery95
46.7Features100
5 spec wins — Vivo Y500 (4G)6 spec wins — Xiaomi 17T Pro

InnoReviews verdict

Xiaomi 17T Pro wins this phone face-off, 81.5 to 49.5, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+56) and features (+53). Vivo Y500 (4G) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Vivo Y500 (4G)

  • 43% higher Peak brightness: 5,000 nits vs 3,500 nits
  • 16% higher capacity: 8,100 mAh vs 7,000 mAh

Reasons to pick the Xiaomi 17T Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 85 vs 29
  • Stronger camera score: 61 vs 34
  • Stronger battery score: 95 vs 71
  • Stronger features score: 100 vs 47
  • 127% higher Wired charging: 100 W vs 44 W

Display

Display comparison: Vivo Y500 (4G) versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
SpecVivo Y500 (4G)Xiaomi 17T Pro
Screen size6.83 ″6.83 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDAMOLED
Resolution1260x28001280x2772
Pixel density449 ppi447 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz+20%
Peak brightness5,000 nits+43%3,500 nits
Screen-to-body90.3 %91.1 %+1%

Performance

Performance comparison: Vivo Y500 (4G) versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
SpecVivo Y500 (4G)Xiaomi 17T Pro
ChipsetUnisoc T7300MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu—3,182,664Top 10%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—911,618Top 10%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—1,228,396Top 9%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—401,602Top 17%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—641,048Top 11%
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128/256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Vivo Y500 (4G) versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
SpecVivo Y500 (4G)Xiaomi 17T Pro
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.67
Ultra-wide—12 MP
Telephoto—50 MP
Optical zoom—5 x
Max video1080p@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera32 MP32 MP
OIS—Yes

Battery

Battery comparison: Vivo Y500 (4G) versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
SpecVivo Y500 (4G)Xiaomi 17T Pro
Capacity8,100 mAh+16%7,000 mAh
Wired charging44 W100 W+127%
Wireless charging—50 W
Active use endurance—20.3 h

Design

Design comparison: Vivo Y500 (4G) versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
SpecVivo Y500 (4G)Xiaomi 17T Pro
Weight210 g+4%219 g
Thickness8.2 mm+1%8.3 mm
IP ratingIP68/IP69IP68
Frame materialPlasticAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Vivo Y500 (4G) versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
SpecVivo Y500 (4G)Xiaomi 17T Pro
5GNoYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.46.0
NFCNoYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIM—Yes

Software

Software comparison: Vivo Y500 (4G) versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
SpecVivo Y500 (4G)Xiaomi 17T Pro
OS at launchAndroid 16 (OriginOS 6)Android 16 (HyperOS 3)

Audio

Audio comparison: Vivo Y500 (4G) versus Xiaomi 17T Pro
SpecVivo Y500 (4G)Xiaomi 17T Pro
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup