Apple A14 Bionic vs MediaTek Helio G200
46CPU25.6
35.1GPU—
53.6Benchmarks41.3
41.1AI—
63.2Efficiency54.9
6 spec wins — Apple A14 Bionic3 spec wins — MediaTek Helio G200
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A14 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 46.9 to 37.2, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+20) and benchmarks (+12). MediaTek Helio G200 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A14 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 46 vs 26
- Stronger benchmarks score: 54 vs 41
- Stronger efficiency score: 63 vs 55
- 174% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,080 vs 760
- 133% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 4,900 vs 2,100
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Helio G200
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
- 17% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 6 W
General
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | MediaTek Helio G200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020 | 2025 |
| Process | 5 nm+17% | 6 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W | 5 W+17% |
| Architecture | Armv8.4 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | MediaTek Helio G200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.0 GHz + 4x1.82 GHz | 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3 GHz+25% | 2.4 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | MediaTek Helio G200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (4-core) | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | MediaTek Helio G200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | — |
| AI performance | 11 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | MediaTek Helio G200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s+99% | 17.1 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | MediaTek Helio G200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X55) | Integrated LTE Cat-13 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | MediaTek Helio G200 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 144Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 2K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | MediaTek Helio G200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 950,000+63%Top 34% | 581,818Top 56% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,080+174%Top 17% | 760Top 66% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,900+133%Top 23% | 2,100Top 63% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,050Top 53% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 212,630Top 95% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 47,609Top 92% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 152,829Top 78% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 168,750Top 95% |
Related comparisons
Apple A14 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2200VSApple A14 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VSApple A14 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSApple A14 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSMediaTek Helio G200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865VSMediaTek Helio G200vs MediaTek Dimensity 920VSMediaTek Helio G200vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200VSMediaTek Helio G200vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020VS
