Apple A14 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2200
47.1CPU38.9
35.9GPU34.3
—Benchmarks63.2
41.1AIspec-based—
63.2Efficiencyspec-based66.5
5 spec wins — Apple A14 Bionic3 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Apple A14 Bionic scores 48.3 against 47.6 for Samsung Exynos 2200. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Apple A14 Bionic edges ahead in CPU and GPU, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A14 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 47 vs 39
- 36% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,171 vs 1,601
- 33% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 9 W
- 29% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 5,064 vs 3,938
- 11% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 2,152 vs 1,946
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
- 20% lower process: 4 nm vs 5 nm
General
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020 | 2022 |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm+20% |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W+33% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.4 | Armv9 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.0 GHz + 4x1.82 GHz | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 3 GHz+7% | 2.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (4-core) | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 11 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | LPDDR5 |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X55) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 12 | — | 1,544,095Top 37% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,171+36%Top 16% | 1,601Top 25% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 5,064+29%Top 22% | 3,938Top 35% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,152+11%Top 24% | 1,946Top 26% |
Related comparisons
Apple A14 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4VSApple A14 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1VSApple A14 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9000VSApple A14 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000VS

