MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
37.8CPU34.3
32.5GPU31
47Benchmarks48.7
69Efficiency66.5
5 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 90002 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2200
InnoReviews verdict
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 43.6 to 41.9, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+4) and efficiency (+3). Samsung Exynos 2200 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 9000
- Stronger CPU score: 38 vs 34
- 11% lower TDP (typical): 8 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2200
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2022 |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W+11% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv9 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X2 + 3x2.52 GHz Cortex-A710 + 4x1.82 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 3.05 GHz+9% | 2.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G710 MC10 | Samsung Xclipse 920 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek APU 590 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-7500 | LPDDR5 |
| Max bandwidth | 60 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 7 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 144Hz | — |
| Video capture | — | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 | Samsung Exynos 2200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,050,000 | 1,100,000+5% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,730+8% | 1,600 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,350+5% | 4,150 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,250+7% | 2,100 |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 9000vs Google Tensor G3VSMediaTek Dimensity 9000vs Apple A14 BionicVSMediaTek Dimensity 9000vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1VSMediaTek Dimensity 9000vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Google Tensor G3VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VS

