Apple A14 Bionic vs Unisoc Tiger T606
46CPU20
35.1GPU—
53.6Benchmarks20
41.1AI—
63.2Efficiency46.7
6 spec wins — Apple A14 Bionic3 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T606
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A14 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 46.9 to 26.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+34) and CPU (+26). Unisoc Tiger T606 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A14 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 46 vs 20
- Stronger benchmarks score: 54 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 63 vs 47
- 433% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,080 vs 390
- 304% higher AnTuTu 10: 950,000 vs 235,000
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T606
- 33% lower TDP (typical): 4 W vs 6 W
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T606 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020 | 2021 |
| Process | 5 nm+58% | 12 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W | 4 W+33% |
| Architecture | Armv8.4 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T606 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.0 GHz + 4x1.82 GHz | 2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3 GHz+87% | 1.6 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T606 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (4-core) | Arm Mali-G57 MP1 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T606 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | — |
| AI performance | 11 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T606 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s+129% | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T606 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X55) | Integrated LTE Cat-7 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T606 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 1080p@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A14 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T606 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 950,000+304%Top 34% | 235,000Top 90% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,080+433%Top 17% | 390Top 89% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,900+250%Top 23% | 1,400Top 85% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,050Top 53% | — |
Related comparisons
Apple A14 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2200VSApple A14 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VSApple A14 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSApple A14 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSUnisoc Tiger T606vs MediaTek Helio G85VSUnisoc Tiger T606vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSUnisoc Tiger T606vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VSUnisoc Tiger T606vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460VS