Apple A15 Bionic vs Huawei Kirin 9000S
51CPU32
40GPU31.3
58.4Benchmarks46.6
50.7AI—
60.7Efficiency34.5
7 spec wins — Apple A15 Bionic2 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9000S
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A15 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 51.2 to 35.5, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+26) and CPU (+19). Huawei Kirin 9000S still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A15 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 51 vs 32
- Stronger GPU score: 40 vs 31
- Stronger benchmarks score: 58 vs 47
- Stronger efficiency score: 61 vs 35
- 121% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,320 vs 1,050
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9000S
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2023 |
| Process | 5 nm+29% | 7 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+22% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.5 | — |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.24 GHz + 4x2.01 GHz | 1x2.62 GHz Taishan Big + 3x2.15 GHz Taishan Mid + 4x1.53 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 3.24 GHz+24% | 2.62 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (4/5-core) | Maleoon 910 |
| GPU clock | — | 750 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | HiSilicon Da Vinci NPU |
| AI performance | 16 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | LPDDR5 |
| Max bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X60) | Integrated 5G modem (unannounced) |
Media
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A15 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,150,000+60%Top 26% | 720,000Top 46% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,320+121%Top 12% | 1,050Top 44% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 5,650+71%Top 19% | 3,300Top 38% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,650+104%Top 41% | 1,300Top 68% |
Related comparisons
Apple A15 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSApple A15 Bionicvs Google Tensor G4VSApple A15 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8350VSApple A15 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Unisoc Tiger T820VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VS

