Huawei Kirin 9000S vs Unisoc Tiger T820
32CPU27
31.3GPU—
46.6Benchmarks35.9
34.5Efficiencyspec-based52.5
3 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9000S3 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T820
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Huawei Kirin 9000S scores 35.5 against 35.6 for Unisoc Tiger T820. Pick by the categories that matter to you, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9000S
- Stronger CPU score: 32 vs 27
- Stronger benchmarks score: 47 vs 36
- 53% higher AnTuTu: 720,000 vs 470,000
- 52% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,050 vs 690
- 47% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 3,300 vs 2,250
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T820
- 33% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 9 W
- 14% lower process: 6 nm vs 7 nm
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2023 |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm+14% |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 6 W+33% |
| Architecture | — | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.62 GHz Taishan Big + 3x2.15 GHz Taishan Mid + 4x1.53 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x2.7 GHz Cortex-A76 + 3x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.62 GHz | 2.7 GHz+3% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Maleoon 910 | Arm Mali-G57 MP4 |
| GPU clock | 750 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | HiSilicon Da Vinci NPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 17.1 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem (unannounced) | Integrated 5G (sub-6) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 720,000+53% | 470,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,050+52%Top 47% | 690Bottom 25% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,300+47%Top 41% | 2,250Bottom 39% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,300Bottom 32% | — |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685VS