Huawei Kirin 9000S vs Unisoc Tiger T820
34.8CPU27
31.7GPU—
—Benchmarks35.9
34.5Efficiencyspec-based52.5
2 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9000S3 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T820
InnoReviews verdict
Unisoc Tiger T820 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 35.6 to 33.6. Huawei Kirin 9000S still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9000S
- Stronger CPU score: 35 vs 27
- 81% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,250 vs 690
- 70% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 3,818 vs 2,250
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T820
- 33% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 9 W
- 14% lower process: 6 nm vs 7 nm
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2023 |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm+14% |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 6 W+33% |
| Architecture | — | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.62 GHz Taishan Big + 3x2.15 GHz Taishan Mid + 4x1.53 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x2.7 GHz Cortex-A76 + 3x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.62 GHz | 2.7 GHz+3% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Maleoon 910 | Arm Mali-G57 MP4 |
| GPU clock | 750 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | HiSilicon Da Vinci NPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 17.1 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem (unannounced) | Integrated 5G (sub-6) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 470,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,250+81%Top 39% | 690Bottom 23% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,818+70%Top 35% | 2,250Bottom 39% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,365Top 49% | — |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 9000Svs MediaTek Dimensity 6100+VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 5VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Samsung Exynos 1280VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs MediaTek Dimensity 7100VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs MediaTek Dimensity 7060VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Huawei Kirin 990 5GVS