Skip to content
InnoReviews

Apple A15 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 9610

Apple A15 Bionic
51.2Inno Score
VS
Samsung Exynos 9610
—Inno Score
51CPU28
40GPU—
58.4Benchmarks—
50.7AIspec-based—
60.7Efficiencyspec-based20
3 spec wins — Apple A15 Bionic1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9610

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 9610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Apple A15 Bionic

  • Stronger CPU score: 51 vs 28
  • 50% lower process: 5 nm vs 10 nm
  • 41% higher Max clock: 3.24 GHz vs 2.3 GHz

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9610

  • 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6

General

General comparison: Apple A15 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecApple A15 BionicSamsung Exynos 9610
Announced20212018
Process5 nm+50%10 nm
TDP (typical)7 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.5Armv8

CPU

CPU comparison: Apple A15 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecApple A15 BionicSamsung Exynos 9610
Cores68+33%
Core configuration2x3.24 GHz + 4x2.01 GHz4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53
Max clock3.24 GHz+41%2.3 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Apple A15 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecApple A15 BionicSamsung Exynos 9610
GPUApple GPU (4/5-core)Arm Mali-G72 MP3

AI

AI comparison: Apple A15 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecApple A15 BionicSamsung Exynos 9610
NPU16-core Neural Engine—
AI performance16 TOPS—

Memory

Memory comparison: Apple A15 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecApple A15 BionicSamsung Exynos 9610
Memory typeLPDDR4X-4266LPDDR4X
Max bandwidth34.1 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Apple A15 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecApple A15 BionicSamsung Exynos 9610
ModemExternal (Snapdragon X60)Integrated LTE Cat-12
Max download—0.6 Gbps
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth—5.0

Media

Media comparison: Apple A15 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecApple A15 BionicSamsung Exynos 9610
Max display—WQXGA (2560x1600)
Video capture4K@60fps4K@120fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Apple A15 Bionic versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecApple A15 BionicSamsung Exynos 9610
AnTuTu1,150,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)2,320Top 13%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)5,650Top 21%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,650Top 37%—

Related comparisons

Apple A15 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSApple A15 Bionicvs Google Tensor G4VSApple A15 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8350VSApple A15 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Samsung Exynos 9611VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GVSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730GVS

Try another matchup