Apple A16 Bionic vs Huawei Kirin 980
56.8CPU24.8
43.7GPU—
61.5Benchmarks33.7
52.7AI—
71.4Efficiency37
8 spec wins — Apple A16 Bionic1 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 980
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A16 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 56.2 to 30.3, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+34) and CPU (+32). Huawei Kirin 980 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A16 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 25
- Stronger benchmarks score: 62 vs 34
- Stronger efficiency score: 71 vs 37
- 376% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,620 vs 550
- 229% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 6,570 vs 2,000
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 980
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 980 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2018 |
| Process | 4 nm+43% | 7 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+12% | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 980 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.46 GHz + 4x2.02 GHz | 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 + 2x1.92 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.46 GHz+33% | 2.6 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 980 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | Arm Mali-G76 MP10 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 980 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Dual NPU (Da Vinci predecessor) |
| AI performance | 17 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 980 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s+50% | 34.1 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 980 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X65) | Integrated LTE Cat-21 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 980 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Huawei Kirin 980 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,300,000+202%Top 23% | 430,000Top 68% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,620+376%Top 11% | 550Top 78% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,570+229%Top 15% | 2,000Top 68% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,100Top 36% | — |
Related comparisons
Apple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSApple A16 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSApple A16 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSHuawei Kirin 980vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845VSHuawei Kirin 980vs MediaTek Dimensity 700VSHuawei Kirin 980vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680VSHuawei Kirin 980vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730VS
