Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2400e
56.8CPU49.9
43.7GPU48.2
61.5Benchmarks70.4
52.7AIspec-based—
71.4Efficiencyspec-based66.5
4 spec wins — Apple A16 Bionic3 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400e
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Apple A16 Bionic scores 56.2 against 56.7 for Samsung Exynos 2400e. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Samsung Exynos 2400e edges ahead in benchmarks and GPU, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A16 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 50
- 27% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,620 vs 2,066
- 22% lower TDP (typical): 7 W vs 9 W
- 12% higher Max clock: 3.46 GHz vs 3.1 GHz
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400e
- Stronger GPU score: 48 vs 44
- Stronger benchmarks score: 70 vs 62
- 67% higher cores: 10 vs 6
- 18% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,656 vs 3,100
General
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2024 |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+22% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 10+67% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.46 GHz + 4x2.02 GHz | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.46 GHz+12% | 3.1 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 17 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X65) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | QHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 1,300,000 | 1,849,346Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 603,988Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 549,480Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 286,140Top 35% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 409,738Top 32% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,620+27%Top 10% | 2,066Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,570+4%Top 14% | 6,341Top 16% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,100Top 26% | 3,656+18%Top 20% |
Related comparisons
Apple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSApple A16 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8450VSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8500VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs MediaTek Dimensity 8450VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs MediaTek Dimensity 8500VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VS

