Apple A16 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon C
56.8CPU30.7
43.7GPU—
61.5Benchmarks—
52.7AI—
71.4Efficiency39.4
3 spec wins — Apple A16 Bionic1 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon C
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A16 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 56.2 to 33.6, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+32) and CPU (+26). Qualcomm Snapdragon C still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A16 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 31
- Stronger efficiency score: 71 vs 39
- 50% lower process: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- 44% higher Max clock: 3.46 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon C
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Qualcomm Snapdragon C |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2019 |
| Process | 4 nm+50% | 8 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | 7 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | ARMv8-A |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Qualcomm Snapdragon C |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.46 GHz + 4x2.02 GHz | 2x 2.4 GHz Kryo 468 Gold + 6x 1.8 GHz Kryo 468 Silver |
| Max clock | 3.46 GHz+44% | 2.4 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Qualcomm Snapdragon C |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | Adreno 618 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Qualcomm Snapdragon C |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | — |
| AI performance | 17 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Qualcomm Snapdragon C |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR4x |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Qualcomm Snapdragon C |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X65) | Snapdragon X15 LTE |
| Max download | — | 0.8 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Qualcomm Snapdragon C |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | 2560x1440 |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K at 30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Qualcomm Snapdragon C |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,300,000Top 23% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,620Top 11% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,570Top 15% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,100Top 36% | — |
Related comparisons
Apple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSApple A16 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSApple A16 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSQualcomm Snapdragon Cvs MediaTek Dimensity 810VSQualcomm Snapdragon Cvs Unisoc Tiger T760VSQualcomm Snapdragon Cvs MediaTek Dimensity 6080VSQualcomm Snapdragon Cvs MediaTek Dimensity 6100+VS

