Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 1330
56.8CPU27.4
43.7GPU—
61.5Benchmarks42.4
52.7AI—
71.4Efficiency65.6
6 spec wins — Apple A16 Bionic3 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1330
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A16 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 56.2 to 40.8, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+29) and benchmarks (+19). Samsung Exynos 1330 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A16 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 27
- Stronger benchmarks score: 62 vs 42
- Stronger efficiency score: 71 vs 66
- 206% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 6,570 vs 2,150
- 199% higher Max bandwidth: 51.2 GB/s vs 17.1 GB/s
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1330
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
- 29% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 7 W
General
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2023 |
| Process | 4 nm+20% | 5 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | 5 W+29% |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.46 GHz + 4x2.02 GHz | 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.46 GHz+44% | 2.4 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | Arm Mali-G68 MP2 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | — |
| AI performance | 17 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s+199% | 17.1 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X65) | Integrated 5G (sub-6) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,300,000+114%Top 23% | 608,174Top 52% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,620+173%Top 11% | 960Top 54% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,570+206%Top 15% | 2,150Top 61% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,100Top 36% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 248,088Top 89% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 42,913Top 98% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 129,402Top 95% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 187,771Top 89% |
Related comparisons
Apple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSApple A16 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSApple A16 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 1330vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VSSamsung Exynos 1330vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VSSamsung Exynos 1330vs Google TensorVSSamsung Exynos 1330vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300VS
