Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 1480
56.8CPU33.7
43.7GPU28.2
61.5Benchmarks47.4
52.7AI—
71.4Efficiency73.8
5 spec wins — Apple A16 Bionic3 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1480
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A16 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 56.2 to 41.9, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+23) and GPU (+16). Samsung Exynos 1480 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A16 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 34
- Stronger GPU score: 44 vs 28
- Stronger benchmarks score: 62 vs 47
- 158% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,100 vs 1,200
- 128% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,620 vs 1,150
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1480
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
- 14% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 7 W
General
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2024 |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | 6 W+14% |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.46 GHz + 4x2.02 GHz | 4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.46 GHz+26% | 2.75 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | Samsung Xclipse 530 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 17 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X65) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 144Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,300,000+75% | 742,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,620+128% | 1,150 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,570+93% | 3,400 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,100+158% | 1,200 |
Related comparisons
Apple A16 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200VSSamsung Exynos 1480vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3VSSamsung Exynos 1480vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3VSSamsung Exynos 1480vs Google TensorVSSamsung Exynos 1480vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VS

