Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 990
56.8CPU29.8
43.7GPU25.7
61.5Benchmarks37.4
52.7AI—
71.4Efficiency32.1
9 spec wins — Apple A16 Bionic1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 990
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A16 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 56.2 to 30.8, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+39) and CPU (+27). Samsung Exynos 990 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A16 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 30
- Stronger GPU score: 44 vs 26
- Stronger benchmarks score: 62 vs 37
- Stronger efficiency score: 71 vs 32
- 244% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,100 vs 900
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 990
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 990 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2020 |
| Process | 4 nm+43% | 7 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+30% | 10 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 990 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.46 GHz + 4x2.02 GHz | 2x2.73 GHz Exynos M5 + 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.46 GHz+27% | 2.73 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 990 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | Arm Mali-G77 MP11 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 990 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | — |
| AI performance | 17 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 990 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5-2750 |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s+16% | 44 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 990 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X65) | Exynos 5123 5G (external) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 990 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | WQHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Samsung Exynos 990 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,300,000+160%Top 23% | 500,000Top 60% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,620+191%Top 11% | 900Top 61% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,570+148%Top 15% | 2,650Top 53% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,100+244%Top 36% | 900Top 81% |
Related comparisons
Apple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSApple A16 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSApple A16 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 990vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695VSSamsung Exynos 990vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730GVSSamsung Exynos 990vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GVSSamsung Exynos 990vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300VS
