Apple A16 Bionic vs Unisoc Tiger T606
56.8CPU20
43.7GPU—
61.5Benchmarks20
52.7AI—
71.4Efficiency46.7
7 spec wins — Apple A16 Bionic2 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T606
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A16 Bionic wins this mobile chipset face-off, 56.2 to 26.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+42) and CPU (+37). Unisoc Tiger T606 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A16 Bionic
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 20
- Stronger benchmarks score: 62 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 71 vs 47
- 572% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,620 vs 390
- 453% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,300,000 vs 235,000
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T606
- 43% lower TDP (typical): 4 W vs 7 W
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T606 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2021 |
| Process | 4 nm+67% | 12 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | 4 W+43% |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T606 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.46 GHz + 4x2.02 GHz | 2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.46 GHz+116% | 1.6 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T606 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | Arm Mali-G57 MP1 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T606 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | — |
| AI performance | 17 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T606 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s+244% | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T606 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X65) | Integrated LTE Cat-7 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T606 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 1080p@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic | Unisoc Tiger T606 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,300,000+453%Top 23% | 235,000Top 90% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,620+572%Top 11% | 390Top 89% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,570+369%Top 15% | 1,400Top 85% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,100Top 36% | — |
Related comparisons
Apple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSApple A16 Bionicvs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSApple A16 Bionicvs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSApple A16 Bionicvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VSUnisoc Tiger T606vs MediaTek Helio G85VSUnisoc Tiger T606vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSUnisoc Tiger T606vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VSUnisoc Tiger T606vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460VS