Apple A17 Pro vs Huawei Kirin 9000S
62.7CPU32
47.8GPU31.3
64.2Benchmarks46.6
72AI—
79.6Efficiency34.5
7 spec wins — Apple A17 Pro1 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9000S
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A17 Pro wins this mobile chipset face-off, 62.7 to 35.5, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+45) and CPU (+31). Huawei Kirin 9000S still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A17 Pro
- Stronger CPU score: 63 vs 32
- Stronger GPU score: 48 vs 31
- Stronger benchmarks score: 64 vs 47
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 35
- 181% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,950 vs 1,050
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9000S
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2023 |
| Process | 3 nm+57% | 7 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W+11% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | — |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.78 GHz + 4x2.11 GHz | 1x2.62 GHz Taishan Big + 3x2.15 GHz Taishan Mid + 4x1.53 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+44% | 2.62 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (6-core) | Maleoon 910 |
| GPU clock | — | 750 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | HiSilicon Da Vinci NPU |
| AI performance | 35 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5 |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X70) | Integrated 5G modem (unannounced) |
Media
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,450,000+101%Top 20% | 720,000Top 46% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,950+181%Top 8% | 1,050Top 44% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,250+120%Top 12% | 3,300Top 38% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,600+177%Top 27% | 1,300Top 68% |
Related comparisons
Apple A17 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300VSApple A17 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Unisoc Tiger T820VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VS

