Apple A18 Pro vs Unisoc T765
70.5CPU24.5
53.5GPU55
69Benchmarks—
72AIspec-based—
79.6Efficiencyspec-based36
5 spec wins — Apple A18 Pro1 spec wins — Unisoc T765
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Unisoc T765 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A18 Pro
- Stronger CPU score: 71 vs 25
- 362% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 3,400 vs 736
- 336% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 8,400 vs 1,925
- 76% higher Max clock: 4.05 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
- 50% lower process: 3 nm vs 6 nm
Reasons to pick the Unisoc T765
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A18 Pro | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2023 |
| Process | 3 nm+50% | 6 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A18 Pro | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x4.05 GHz + 4x2.42 GHz | 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 4.05 GHz+76% | 2.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A18 Pro | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (6-core) | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 |
| GPU clock | — | 850 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Apple A18 Pro | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | — |
| AI performance | 35 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A18 Pro | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-7500 | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | 60 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A18 Pro | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X75) | Integrated 5G (SA/NSA), LTE Cat-15 (DL) / Cat-18 (UL) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A18 Pro | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@120fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A18 Pro | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,750,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,400+362%Top 5% | 736Bottom 29% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,400+336%Top 10% | 1,925Bottom 27% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 4,300Top 19% | — |