Apple A18 vs Unisoc T765
68.4CPU24.5
50.6GPU55
67.5Benchmarks—
72AIspec-based—
82.1Efficiencyspec-based36
5 spec wins — Apple A181 spec wins — Unisoc T765
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Unisoc T765 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A18
- Stronger CPU score: 68 vs 25
- 342% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 3,250 vs 736
- 318% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 8,050 vs 1,925
- 76% higher Max clock: 4.04 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
- 50% lower process: 3 nm vs 6 nm
Reasons to pick the Unisoc T765
- Stronger GPU score: 55 vs 51
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A18 | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2023 |
| Process | 3 nm+50% | 6 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A18 | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x4.04 GHz performance + 4x2.2 GHz efficiency | 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 4.04 GHz+76% | 2.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A18 | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core) | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 |
| GPU clock | — | 850 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Apple A18 | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Neural Engine (16-core) | — |
| AI performance | 35 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A18 | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-6400 | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | 60 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A18 | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X70 5G (external) | Integrated 5G (SA/NSA), LTE Cat-15 (DL) / Cat-18 (UL) |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A18 | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | Super Retina XDR | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@120fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A18 | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,650,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,250+342%Top 6% | 736Bottom 29% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,050+318%Top 11% | 1,925Bottom 27% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,950Top 22% | — |